From the early looks of things, this figures to not be the case. I've found that sportsbooks have been well overpricing Monfils. This is because of the general betting public'sdbnumberone said:i see the powerpoint didn't spit out anything on monfils/koubek - is that a trap bet or what? i'm sure monfils will prove too tempting for me, no bet yet though
For all that you figure to win on the other three bets, that is if they DO all win, then you would've lost more than that gain if Spadea defeats Seppi. Are you serious?sports freak said:Best bet is on Seppi over Spadea!!!!Saw what i like last night of Andreas and OUT OF FORM,UP N DOWN Vince is gonna have a hard time!!!!
10 units on Andreas Seppi 1.95 over Vince Spadea!!!!!
6 units on Ferrer 1.53 over Zib!!!!
1 unit on Philip Kohl 2.70 over Melzer!!!
1 unit on Ram 3.50 over Massu!!!
havent you heard?NewTennisFan said:Regarding the disparaging comment made about Spadea's hard court form...
Have you wondered why you haven't been able to find the same form in Seppi's record?
It's because he hasn't even been getting through the qualifiers! Like last week, when he was stopped by South African tennis giant Wes Moodie in the very first qualifying round of the Cincy masters.
Oh... dear...its.like.that said:havent you heard?
vinny has thrown in the racquet for the mike .
I think you may be onto something there, pal. Though, the "big" part scares me. After all, this IS Vincent.dbnumberone said:heaven help me, apologies to sportsfreak, but I'm thinking of a big bet on Spadea, not sure yet