[Federer-Fan]

Nadal is 36-35 against the top 10 on outdoor hard court and less surprisingly 15-15 indoors. I'd say this record is a bit disappointing, it's strange to think Nadal loses 49,3% of the time against a top 10 player on outdoor hard court (which is supposed to be his 2nd best surface).

 

[Method Man]

This shows he has no business in a GOAT debate.

 

[Chokehater]

Must be some injuries :shrug:

 

[nadalfan2013]

Nadal is 36-35 against the top 10 on outdoor hard court and less surprisingly 15-15 indoors. I'd say this record is a bit disappointing, it's strange to think Nadal loses 49,3% of the time against a top 10 player on outdoor hard court (which is supposed to be his 2nd best surface).

I don't know what stats you are looking at but on HARDCOURT Nadal is against:

Djokovic 7-14 (2-2 in slams)
Federer 9-6 (3-0 in slams)
Murray 4-4 (2-2 in slams)
Wawrinka 7-1 (1-1 in slams)
Nishikori 3-0 (1-0 in slams)
Berdych 11-4 (1-1 in slams)
Ferrer 4-4 (0-2 in slams)
Cilic 1-1 (1-0 in slams)
Raonic 4-1 (0-0 in slams)

TOTAL: 50-35 (11-8 in slams)

I hate fedtards Pathetic losers and liars. You said 36-35 + 15-15, which would make 51-50 which is totally false. You can't even count. Anything to make threads that bash Nadal.

 

[Federer-Fan]

I don't know what stats you are looking at but on HARDCOURT Nadal is against:

Djokovic 7-14 (2-2 in slams)
Federer 9-6 (3-0 in slams)
Murray 4-4 (2-2 in slams)
Wawrinka 7-1 (1-1 in slams)
Nishikori 3-0 (1-0 in slams)
Berdych 11-4 (1-1 in slams)
Ferrer 4-4 (0-2 in slams)
Cilic 1-1 (1-0 in slams)
Raonic 4-1 (0-0 in slams)

TOTAL: 50-35 (11-8 in slams)

I hate fedtards Pathetic losers and liars.

You're such a big clown. :lol:
Nadal is 36-35 (10-11 in Slams) when he faced a top 10 player on outdoor hard court. I'm not talking about his wins and losses to the current top 10, that would make no sense (how is beating Raonic in 2010 relevant for example ?).

 

[nadalfan2007]

What are you talking about? So stupid fedtards :superlol: :superlol::superlol:

 

[blackwell]

TOTAL: 50-35

Clown, go to sleep and stop lying. He has 51-50

http://www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/player.cgi?p=RafaelNadal&f=ACareerqqB0ITop_10qq

 

[Federer-Fan]

What are you talking about? So stupid fedtards :superlol: :superlol::superlol:

I'm talking about Nadal's record against top 10 players on HC. The stupid one is definitely the guy who fails to understand this thread.

 

[Fogmeister]

He's not top 10 on hardcourts, he just had some great peaks.

 

[nadalfan2013]

I'm talking about Nadal's record against top 10 players on HC. The stupid one is definitely the guy who fails to understand this thread.

You clearly said he's x-x against THE Top 10 on hardcourt. Next time, pay attention to what you write.

 

[Federer-Fan]

You clearly said he's x-x against THE Top 10 on hardcourt. Next time, pay attention to what you write.

Okay, next time I'll write 'he's x-x against players that were ranked in the top 10 according to the ATP as of last Monday', in order to be sure you understand. :yeah:

 

[nadalfan2013]

The bottom line, he won 1 Australian Open beating Federer in the final, and 2 US Opens beating Djokovic in the finals. He also won 8 Masters 1000 on hardcourt. He also won the Olympics on Hardcourt. He has nothing to prove on hardcourt, everything else is bonus.

He has 3 slams on hardcourt, which is the total of Murray, Roddick and Hewitt combined. Get lost. Enough about the anti-Nadal thread. Everytime I start a thread with negative stats about Federer, they get deleted. These forums are so pro-Federer and anti-Nadal, it's disgusting.

 

[duarte_a]

I don't know what stats you are looking at but on HARDCOURT Nadal is against:

I hate fedtards Pathetic losers and liars. You said 36-35 + 15-15, which would make 51-50 which is totally false. You can't even count. Anything to make threads that bash Nadal.

What are you talking about? So stupid fedtards :superlol: :superlol::superlol:

OP is saying that Dull has won approximately 50% of the matches on outdoor HC when he faced a player who was top 10 AT THE TIME.

Is it that hard to understand such a basic statement?!

 

[counterloop]

Nadal is not as great on hard court as he is on clay. Water is wet. Next?

 

[nadalfan2007]

OP is saying that Dull has won approximately 50% of the matches on outdoor HC when he faced a player who was top 10 AT THE TIME.

Is it that hard to understand such a basic statement?!

Who cares? 9-6 against Federer is impressive :wavey:

 

[nadalfan2007]

Federer has 32-26 agaisnt TOP10 on clay. :spit: Real GOAT :haha:

 

[romismak]

Most interesting statistic here is that he has almost identical numbers on outdoor HC and indoor HC - interesting indeed - indoor HC is his worst surface - but he had some WTF´s when he was playing well and having positive ratio and some when he was bad and had negative - like 2009 when he lost all his RR matches there so it somehow balances out + Paris Bercy matches and than i don ´t now where else he played indoor HC top 10 guys

 

[romismak]

Federer has 32-26 agaisnt TOP10 on clay. :spit: Real GOAT :haha:

Take away Nadal and this number would be far better and % wise very good - he was most of his career 2nd best player during clay season

 

[Federer-Fan]

Federer has 32-26 agaisnt TOP10 on clay. :spit: Real GOAT :haha:

It's a significantly better record than Nadal's hard court one.

 

[Batemans]

Better than I expected