Joined
·
2,535 Posts
I think YES, He is all-court player. Just clay (and more in RG) more suited for his game for reason of fact there are not so many great power clay-court players.
He is good on indoors?It’s not much of a question. 4 USO, 1 AO on hard, 12 RG (clay), 2 WB (grass). That’s all the evidence you need.
I thought the OP was going to pose an opinion contrary to popular belief.![]()
you mean outdoorclay and indoorclay?All clay court player, yes...
Yes. I’d say an 84-38 career record is pretty solid don’t you think?He is good on indoors?
Outdoor..everywhere else he is uselessyou mean outdoorclay and indoorclay?
Polish commentators always praise Nadal's ability at the net. It's just an MTF meme that he's useless there.All-court player? For real? You cannot be serious....... I would not call someone who wins over half his titles on one surface and comes to net only to shake hands an all-court player. Not to mention he’s practically useless indoors as he still has 0 WTF titles.
Then what do you say about grass?I think YES, He is all-court player. Just clay (and more in RG) more suited for his game for reason of fact there are not so many great power clay-court players.