Nadal has just one shot

Oh God the guy lost to someone who played unbelievable, why am I not surpirsed all the tennis geniuses on this board would find ways to tell him how to improve

to be honest, that's not true. his movement sets him apart from the rest. but being fast doesn't cut it on hardcourts, grass and carpet

I agree, he appeared pretty one dimensional and unable to adjust and he was simply overpowered most of time

:retard:

Yeah, OK. I guess number two at 19, a French Open title, a hard court Masters Series title, two other Masters titles, and a bunch of other titles elsewhere aren't good enough. I mean, clearly he only has a forehand in his arsenal. That's why he's actually challenged Federer in all three meetings, right? Well, Nadal just got lucky there, you know... And it's not as if he wasn't playing an inspired James Blake playing to the best of his abilities, supported fully by the crowd... Yep. Just a forehand.

oh my god, please say tha same after his victories, please say the same after his Final in Miami, of after his victory in Montreal.
today he played bad and James extremely well, and????
it's unfair to say after a defeat that he has only one shot, and also is something stupid!!!!!!
with only a shot you can't be World Nº2 and win a GS and 3 AMS, and if you reach all these only with a forehand is that the rest of the ATP Players are really pathetic for not beating him :lol:!!!!

this thread is .... una mierda!

croat123 said:

to be honest, that's not true. his movement sets him apart from the rest. but being fast doesn't cut it on hardcourts, grass and carpet

Click to expand...

for hardcourt, it's already good enough to give you at least one TMS title on hardcourt and another TMS final within just a few months
more to come

Becool said:

He needs to work on his other shots, to be a complete player..

Click to expand...

thanks for stating the obvious. do you know a player who doesn't?

Nadal loses a match and now he has problems? Give me a break............. Nadal just lost a match, that's all. It is bound to happen once in a while.

federer express said:

thanks for stating the obvious. do you know a player who doesn't?

Click to expand...

THANK YOU!! well said...

fantastic, fantastic thread. truly brilliant. thread of the year. someone give the guy an award.

Flibbertigibbet said:

Yeah, OK. I guess number two at 19, a French Open title, a hard court Masters Series title, two other Masters titles, and a bunch of other titles elsewhere aren't good enough. I mean, clearly he only has a forehand in his arsenal. That's why he's actually challenged Federer in all three meetings, right? Well, Nadal just got lucky there, you know... And it's not as if he wasn't playing an inspired James Blake playing to the best of his abilities, supported fully by the crowd... Yep. Just a forehand.

Click to expand...

Yes, he is great on clay but his tactics are lacking elsewhere . But I give him credit, he is young and has shown immense progress over time and will add more to his game for non clay courts because he has the tools.

adee-gee said:

fantastic, fantastic thread. truly brilliant. thread of the year. someone give the guy an award.

Click to expand...

someone will be giving him an award --hes right up there with some other great ones

federer express said:

thanks for stating the obvious. do you know a player who doesn't?

Click to expand...

Marat Safin

In_Disguise said:

Marat Safin

Click to expand...

not true

mitalidas said:

someone will be giving him an award --hes right up there with some other great ones

Click to expand...

this one takes the title in my humble opinion. the man/woman must be rewarded. a true tennis genius.

:lol:

In_Disguise said:

Marat Safin

Click to expand...

Are you seriously claiming Marat Safin doesn't need to work on any shot :scratch:

adee-gee said:

Are you seriously claiming Marat Safin doesn't need to work on any shot :scratch:

Click to expand...

I think he views Marat's volleys as firstrate