Re: Nadal & Borg winning percentage is really overrated │ New Stats 76 & 77 & 113!
Stalking? :lol: Hilarious. So you'll report me for calling you on inventing stats and lying? Sure, go ahead and do it. The hypocrisy of your last line being in direct contradiction to your empty threats will be lost on you I am sure. If you don't want people to call you out on lying or deliberately misrepresenting facts then make sure you are honest all the time.It is you who is spewing lies here about me, in stalking way too... this is not the first time. At no point have I falsified any stat or lied about anyone. In your first day over a month ago I may have misrepresented something you said but I never wrote lies about you. Let it go already. If you carry on this behaviour I will report you to mods, heck maybe even to Litotes.
Litotes, I think you invented this fight from nothing... I merely argued that Sampras' and Nadal's career win% is influenced by surface distribution... which is certainly true, is it not?
If you want to argue against it with stats that's ok but ad hominem against me was imo uncalled for. Even if I had been wrong I don't think that deserved personal insults in condescending manner.
Tennis is only a game ffs, not a matter of life and death...