evanzo said:
pathetic isnt it
evanzo said:What the hell is it with people on this forum just toally rubbishing Andrew Murray?
yes mark petchey. what a long, boring and full of shit post!!!evanzo said:What the hell is it with people on this forum just toally rubbishing Andrew Murray? 'federer express' you need to STFU because I would think you would be tired by now of being wrong, it is clear your are on this forum only to glorify Federer.
The braindead assumptions that pass an analysis here are laughable. Murray is 18, yet his critics talk about him as if his game is not going to improve from this point. I can't help but wonder if a lot of this is bitterness stemming from the fact that Murray's performance for this year will put him on par with better thought of players like Gasquet and Monfils a the same age.
Those saying Murray has no power in his game must have missed the near 100mph forehands he was blasting past Stephanek at Wimbledon, or the blistering backhand passing shots. Then there is the serve, which looks like it is going to develop into a huge weapon.
MTF is not exactly a bastion of high quality tennis analysis, and boy does it show. There is a very good reason people like Mcenroe, Wilander and Connors are talking up Murray, there is a good reason that he is getting a lot of coverage in professional tennis publications, it's because people who understand the game can see Murray has the goods to get to the top. You don't see the same enthusiasm for Monfils or even Gasquet. The buzz around Murray is reminicent of the buzz around Federer before he was famous, and when armchair tennis fans the world ovr were saying 'bah...that Federer kid will never get into the top 10'. When will you clueless wonders learn.
'federer express', watch Murray get into the top 10 next year and see how idiotic your criticisms truly were. Maybe you should try ignoring your prejudices and watch one of Murray's better matches. See just how early he moves to make a shot, how he seems to have all the time in the world. Watch the ROS and see just how early he can take the ball, appreciate the Mcenroesque like brilliance that sees him consistently pull of jaw dropping shots.
In a sense I suppose all this criticism Murray gets shows just how well he is doing, he's making his critics look stupid and this leads them to make ever more ridiculous criticisms
evanzo said:it is clear your are on this forum only to glorify Federer.
federer express said:McEnroe-esque like brilliance?????![]()
(just what we need...another british person obsessed with ordinary british players!)
evanzo said:The buzz around Murray is reminicent of the buzz around Federer before he was famous
what predictions would they be?? you are demented. and i feel confident diagnosing that as it is my job!!!evanzo said:Pointless arguing with a fool, you predictions are lauaghable, as is your record here. The substance-such as it is-of your argument against Murrat getting to the top is based on fascile assumptions. The fact that *you* cannot see why Murray is going to be big does not preclude it happening.
federer express said:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which is why i said feder has played shit all week and i think roddick will beat him. get your head out of murray's ass and you might find it easier to read!
federer express said:what predictions would they be?? you are demented. and i feel confident diagnosing that as it is my job!!!
judging by yours i would have thought ugly bastard!evanzo said:Really? Judging by the avatar I would have though 'rent boy'.
You don't see the same enthusiasm for Monfils or Gasquet? Maybe not where you live but I have certainly seen enough enthusiams for these guys and certainly for Gasquet.evanzo said:there is a good reason that he is getting a lot of coverage in professional tennis publications, it's because people who understand the game can see Murray has the goods to get to the top. You don't see the same enthusiasm for Monfils or even Gasquet
Tennis Fool said:Scary that this *new* poster knows everything about Federer Express. Leads me to conclude:
1) a longtime lurker who's had enough
2) Leena
3) Sjengster (j/k)