Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 77 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
104 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
If the title is difficult to understand, here are some examples:

Wawrinka has 3 Grand Slam titles, while Del Potro has only 1.

You can use multiple players as well:

Federer has 6 AO titles more than Nadal and Murray combined. Looks incredibly weird to me.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,510 Posts
Jack Sock and Fabio Fognini have won a grand slam, while Ferrer , Berdych , Tsonga , have not
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,395 Posts
Thomas Johansson and Juan Martin del Potro have the same number of slams.

Andy Murray (great as he was) has 14 Masters titles while Pete Sampras only has 11
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
9,505 Posts
Thomas Johansson and Juan Martin del Potro have the same number of slams.

Andy Murray (great as he was) has 14 Masters titles while Pete Sampras only has 11
In a harder era. Whats that tell you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tribalfusion

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,395 Posts
In a harder era. Whats that tell you?
Firstly that Murray was one hell of a player, who was unlucky to play in the era of the big 3. Only trolls like the ones in the other thread would dispute that.

Also that Sampras only seemed to peak for slams and not much else.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,342 Posts
Excellent though surprising (on paper), makes sense in the end.
Of course, everything makes sense in the end. Here it is in particular the fact that the only great titles of Davydenko are those which miss with Nadal. :)

But it also works with Murray-Zverev / Fognini-Wawrinka having a Rome / MC while Federer has none.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,230 Posts
In a harder era. Whats that tell you?
Peaking for slams >>>>> peaking for BO3

Yearly record in slam finals vs masters finals:

Murray:
2008: 0-1, 2-0
2009: 0-0, 2-1
2010: 0-1, 2-0
2011: 0-1, 2-0
2012: 1-1, 0-2
2013: 1-1, 1-0

2014: 0-0, 0-0
2015: 0-1, 2-2
2016: 1-2, 3-2

Sampras:
1990: 1-0, 0-0
1991: 0-0, 0-2
1992: 0-1, 1-0
1993: 2-0, 1-0
1994: 2-0, 3-0
1995: 2-1, 2-2
1996: 1-0, 0-1
1997: 2-0, 2-0
1998: 1-0, 0-2
1999: 1-0, 1-0
2000: 1-1, 1-0
2001: 0-1, 0-1
2002: 1-0, 0-0

Bolded are the seasons where the player performed better in slams than masters.
Very telling that two of Murray's slam-winning years had him abandon masters to focus on slams. Could even say that about 2016 slam season as mury was poor in HC masters until his post-USO (that is post-slam season) push for YE#1, admittedly strong during the clay swing though.
He consistently won 2 masters/year in every non-slam-winning prime season (2014 backray was subpar and doesn't count as prime obviously), but made 4 slam finals in those seasons combined - and managed to take one set total, lol.

Meanwhile Sampras strongly prioritised slams, particularly post-peak. From 1996 onwards, Sampras won 7 slams - half of his total and 1/year on average - and only 4 masters. Pete's masters competition is also underrated... he lost to a strong variety of peaking players: Agassi, Becker, Edberg, Chang, Forget, Ivanisevic, Krajicek, Stich, Rafter, Safin, even Muster and Bruguera. Plenty of QF/SF losses to eventual winners, a steadfast sign of strong era varying competition.
 

·
justice for all
Joined
·
16,227 Posts
Jim Courier has more slam titles than Andy Murray.
Mats Wilander has more than twice as many slam titles as Andy Murray.
 
1 - 20 of 77 Posts
Top