He still played semifinals last two wimbledon aged 32 and 33.Agassi was great on all surfaces. So was Borg, Laver and so many others etc. This era because of Homogenisation Fed and Djokovic are great on all surfaces as well, but the competition is weaker. Nadal misses out because of his poor indoor hc record and inflated grass record. He's been quite poor on grass from 2012-17.
Look get over it. FOR NOW Federer and Nadal are sharing the argument. In 5 years time Djokovic will have relegated both to 2nd and 3rd spot.
Rod laver didnt play on grass, hardcourt and clay in 4 different slams. So no he didnt dominate. He had a few decent rivals. Nothing like the field today. He would be lucky to make a semi final today.We've already seen that player: Rod Laver. Dominated all his opponents across all surfaces for two Calendar year slams. The big three are ruled out of the GOAT contention until they match that feat, just like every other historical player.
Laver won slams on indoor wood. He is a three surface slam winner just like the big three. You need to read up on your history.Rod laver didnt play on grass, hardcourt and clay in 4 different slams. So no he didnt dominate. He had a few decent rivals. Nothing like the field today. He would be lucky to make a semi final today.
Federer, Nadal.and Djokovic are BY FAR the greatest players to ever live. The only thing to be decided is who is the greatest of them. I believe in 5 years Djokovic will be the undisputed greatest player of alltime. Others will say Federer or Nadal. But the records just wont compare..and it's the numbers that will tell the story.