Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 102 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,771 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
who?? :confused: whom?? :confused:

ITF in new alert over 'fixed' match

By Clive White and Gavin Versi
(Filed: 11/09/2005)

The match-fixing scandal that tennis hoped would quietly go away has been back in evidence here at the United States Open.

The International Tennis Federation, under whose jurisdiction the Open falls, were alerted to a possible "fix" in the second round of the men's singles and are investigating the match in question.

It is the 48th match to fall under suspicion since the Sunday Telegraph's exclusive revelation two years ago that players were deliberately throwing matches for financial gain, but it is rare for one to occur at a grand slam event.

The Association of Tennis Professionals, the governing body of the men's professional circuit, were made aware of a sustained gamble by a group of well-known Austrian betters and passed on their tip-off to the ITF. They were warned of a specific likely ending to a match, that turned out to be correct but, due to certain circumstances, the backers did not profit by as much as they had hoped, which was seven times their stake.

The ATP have been unable to prove guilt in any of the previous 47 matches, but a match at last year's St Poelten Open, between the Georgian Irakli Labadze and Julian Knowle, of Austria, is the subject of a legal action brought by a close friend of Labadze's. He bet heavily on a 2-1 win for Knowle but bookmakers Cashpoint withheld his winnings, claiming that the match, between two friends, was fixed. Both Knowle and Labadze, who was once fined under the Tour's non-effort rule after a match in Palermo in 2003, have denied any wrongdoing.

It had been hoped that the Memorandum of Understanding that the ATP signed with Betfair, the online odds exchange, during the Sunday Telegraph's initial investigation, would go some way towards eradicating the match-fixing problem. Unfortunately, according to our investigations, this has not been the case. Those involved simply use the accounts of associates who are not accredited to the tournament.

As a senior ATP figure admitted, unless it can be proved that communication has taken place between a player and a better, no prosecutions can be made, even if the scale of the problem is reflected in the organisation's policy of "routinely monitor[ing] every match all the time… no change in odds escapes our broad network of oversight".

Players' inclinations to involve themselves in this scurrilous practice may surprise some but almost all the matches investigated occurred in the first round, where losers' prize money is just a few thousand dollars at most. Players and their intermediaries can profit by more than 10 times as much by deliberately losing a match. Frequently the losing player has been carrying an injury and was likely to lose in any case.

As a leading London bookmaker put it: "I am not saying that any player was paid to lose, but what I am saying is that in all probability the outcome of these matches was known before the players stepped on to the court.

''If you went into a casino and stood beside a roulette wheel that came up red 47 times in a row, you may start to look under the table to see what was happening to cause such an extraordinary run. It is mathematically possible, but at odds of hundreds of millions to one, highly improbable."

While players' involvement remains the arrowhead of a problem that may never go away, the ATP's effort to eliminate match-fixing have occasionally been undermined by their own actions. At the Casablanca Open in May last year, for example, a tournament director granted a player's request to reschedule his match so that, if he lost, he would be able to enter the qualifying draw of a more prestigious event.

Bjorn Rehnquist, of Sweden, was scheduled to face Nicolas Mahut in the fourth match on court. Win or lose, he would have missed the 4pm deadline for confirming entry into the French Open qualifying. Paulo Pereira, the tournament director, accepted Rehnquist's wish to play the match earlier. While there is no suggestion that Rehnquist, who lost the match 6-1, 6-2, did not give his very best effort, the ATP needlessly put themselves in a position where the integrity of a match could be questioned.

The ATP's words have not always been backed-up by their actions. When the Sunday Telegraph made its revelations two years ago, Mark Miles, then ATP chief executive and now senior adviser, responded: "We did not invite punters into this sport. If there's anything we can do to escort them out, we'd be happy to do that." So who was allowed to sponsor the Kitzbuhel Open in Austria last month? A bookmaker.

http://sport.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,459 Posts
Here are the second round matches:

Andre Agassi [7] def Ivo Karlovic
James Blake def Igor Andreev
Robby Ginepri def Gilles Muller
Guillermo Coria [8] def Vincent Spadea
Xavier Malisse def Brian Baker
Tommy Haas [29] def Rainer Schuettler
Richard Gasquet [13] def Giorgio Galimberti
Robin Soderling def Feliciano Lopez
Mikhail Youzhny [24] def Jonas Bjorkman
Stanislas Wawrinka def Mariano Puerta
Ivan Ljubicic [18] def Cyril Saulnier
Sebastien Grosjean def Thomas Johansson
Tommy Robredo [19] def Gustavo Kuerten
Tomas Berdych [32] def Ricardo Mello
Taylor Dent [25] def Nicolas Almagro
Roger Federer [1] def Fabrice Santoro
Lleyton Hewitt [3] def Jose Acasuso
David Nalbandian [11] def Peter Wessels
Paradorn Srichaphan def Nikolay Davydenko
Arnaud Clement def Andy Murray
Fernando Verdasco def Paul Capdeville
David Ferrer [17] def Karol Kucera
Olivier Rochus [27] def Albert Montanes
Dominik Hrbaty [15] def Michael Lammer
Max Mirnyi [30] def Florent Serra
Nicolas Kiefer def Radek Stepanek
Davide Sanguinetti def Carlos Moya
Novak Djokovic def Mario Ancic
Fernando Gonzalez [21] def Dmitry Tursunov
Jarkko Nieminen def Bjorn Phau
 

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,564 Posts
:sad: Davy .. :ignore: .. again?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,771 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
thanks tangerine. i really appreciate this. :hug:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,433 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,271 Posts
Match fixes generally happen in obscure events...sounds dubious.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,309 Posts
It´s gonna be interesting to see if they´ll release the names of the players, but I wouldn´t count on it. But we shouldn´t suspect anyone right now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
557 Posts
A tanking can happen anytime, anywhere in the first rounds of any tournament.

If a player lacks motivation, he can throw away a match and tell someone to bet against him to make some extra cash. Of course I'm sure it happened in the past, and it will happen again.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,626 Posts
Bilbo said:
Davydenko. That fucker cost me over $2000 :banghead: :banghead:
I dont think it was Nikolay, yes he lost in straight sets, but the score was 4-6, 5-7, 3-6 Plus, he just pulled out of a tounament because of injury.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,626 Posts
What about Feli?

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/10/22/1066631500565.html?from=storyrhs&oneclick=true

A spokesman for the website, who declined to be named, has said that its report on the obscure Long Island match between Feliciano Lopez and Jarkko Nieminen in August - in which Lopez retired ill in the second set after an unusually large sum had been bet on Nieminen - had aroused the interest of the ATP, and its executive vice-president of rules and competition, Richard Ings.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
696 Posts
tennischick said:
At the Casablanca Open in May last year, for example, a tournament director granted a player's request to reschedule his match so that, if he lost, he would be able to enter the qualifying draw of a more prestigious event.

Bjorn Rehnquist, of Sweden, was scheduled to face Nicolas Mahut in the fourth match on court. Win or lose, he would have missed the 4pm deadline for confirming entry into the French Open qualifying. Paulo Pereira, the tournament director, accepted Rehnquist's wish to play the match earlier. While there is no suggestion that Rehnquist, who lost the match 6-1, 6-2, did not give his very best effort, the ATP needlessly put themselves in a position where the integrity of a match could be questioned.

http://sport.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml

it's standard procedure for both the ATP and WTA to allow scheduling so that players can get from one tournie to the next if they lose. This point about Rehnquist should have been left out of the article as such scheduling happens every week.
 
1 - 20 of 102 Posts
Top