It's the most pathetic event that I can recall seeing. Of course it counts, though!"doesn't count, asterisk, etc..."![]()
That surprises me.Hopefully the first of many.
Kecmanovic reminds me a bit of Nalbandian (but without the returning skills).
Safe to say that Hanfmann will never get a better chance than this.Hanfmann def. Hanfmann. IDK if he was done physically or just mentally too weak. That's the most winnable tournament he'll ever see.
There are completely differentHopefully the first of many.
Kecmanovic reminds me a bit of Nalbandian (but without the returning skills).
I thought he's Croatian. It's hard to keep track of all these kids.Apart from Novak, and Tipsaravic, I get all the other Serbian players mixed up.
Which one is this? They all blur into one.
All these new Balkan players blur into one and all totally irrelevant.I thought he's Croatian. It's hard to keep track of all these kids.
There are no "pathetic" events at ATP level, and I love seeing guys get a crack at a run and money and points that wouldn't necessarily get the chance.It's the most pathetic event that I can recall seeing. Of course it counts, though!
That surprises me.
Why? Not the most athletic outhere, solid/compact groundstrokes which are quite heavy and penetrating. No real weak side but forehand more prone to let him down when under pressure.There are completely different
I agree! I'm only saying that this is the weakest level of play that I can recall ever having seen in the latter half of an ATP event. That's all I mean.There are no "pathetic" events at ATP level, and I love seeing guys get a crack at a run and money and points that wouldn't necessarily get the chance.
Plus if you want to play the "look at the rankings" card, it's no different than Pune, Houston, New York, the Chinese 250s, etc.. etc...
It's KecmanovicApart from Novak, and Tipsaravic, I get all the other Serbian players mixed up.
Which one is this? They all blur into one.
The only similarity I can see is a technicality on the forehand side which only applies when Miomir Kecmanović in in an optimal position on the baseline with the opportunity to play an offensive stroke. Specifically, it is the take back, which is actually very similar. But it's so insignificant that in any other position, he plays the stroke in a completely different way, when it was David Nalbandian's modus operandi.Why? Not the most athletic outhere, solid/compact groundstrokes which are quite heavy and penetrating. No real weak side but forehand more prone to let him down when under pressure.
Kecmanovic will only get better.
KEK?It's Kecmanovic