Joined
·
2,249 Posts
http://www.ft.com/ig/features/baseline/federer-nadal-different-paths-greatness/
So called "Simpson's Paradox"
Nadal has won 13.3% of matches where he won less points than opponent. Thats insane, more than double average and other top 4. Average is ~5-6%
Federer 4.1%, Nole 6.3%, 6.7%
Nadal has also lost only 1.6% where he won more points than opponent. In comparison, Federer 3.4%, Nole 1.9%, Murray 3.1%.
Insane numbers of how Nadal is able to clutch out so many of his matches, while Federer is very average.
I think this is part of the explanation of his decline this year. Not being able to play the big points as well because of mental confidence. He's able to grit through a lot of matches in the past through sheer will despite getting outplayed.
So called "Simpson's Paradox"
Nadal has won 13.3% of matches where he won less points than opponent. Thats insane, more than double average and other top 4. Average is ~5-6%
Federer 4.1%, Nole 6.3%, 6.7%
Nadal has also lost only 1.6% where he won more points than opponent. In comparison, Federer 3.4%, Nole 1.9%, Murray 3.1%.
Insane numbers of how Nadal is able to clutch out so many of his matches, while Federer is very average.
I think this is part of the explanation of his decline this year. Not being able to play the big points as well because of mental confidence. He's able to grit through a lot of matches in the past through sheer will despite getting outplayed.