Mens Tennis Forums banner

21 - 40 of 51 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,716 Posts
also nadal didnt play murray or del potro

or nalbandian/ davydenko/ blake/roddick

obvious draw fixing is obvious
LOL

those names all suck this time. Sorry about it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,716 Posts
The difference is nadal has beaten Roger in a hard court slam bit Roger never beat nadal in a clay court slam...
Your right, Nadal is still better than Fed if both plays their best
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,422 Posts
Now that Rafa has reached the final and has a chance to win the USO tomorrow, will Nadaltards and Fedhaters finally stop putting an asterisk on Fed winning RG, similarity will the Fedtards and Nadalhaters stop trying to devalue Rafa's win?

If Rafa doesn't have to go through the 5-time champion/6-time finalist to win his first US Open, then tards should stop trying to use the "Roger didn't have to beat Rafa to win his first French Open!!!"> argument.

So basically, can the fans both sides just agree that you play whoever is on the other side of the net and it doesn't matter if you don't beat the multiple time champion as long as you win?


apples and oranges..

rafa leads roger 14:7, 6:2 at the majors, 5:2 in slam finals, and has beaten roger in the finals on all slam surfaces (clay, grass and hc='09 aussie open).. in other words, rafa 'owns' roger at the slams on all surfaces and does not need to beat roger anywhere on any surface to prove anything to anyone at the majors.. hence, no asterisk needed tomorrow..

by comparison, roger trails rafa 2:10 on clay and has never beaten rafa at r garros despite 4 attempts ('05-08), most disastrously in the '08 final, the most lopsided loss ever by a number-one-ranked player in a slam final.. i.e., roger still has to prove himself against rafa at r garros, which is why the swiss' win at r garros in '09 without having to go through rafa (roger's worst nemesis, the defending champion, the best clay-court player of his generation or perhaps ever, and the man who's denied him on 4-consecutive occasions) leaves much to be desired.. hence the asterisk..

like i said: apples and oranges..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
595 Posts
If Fed gets an asterisk for RG, Nadal gets one here, actually he gets 6 asterisks, one for each round of the cakewalk draw. And then a double asterisk for the two spaniard rounds, essentially walkovers, bringing the grand total to 8!

Rafael Nadal: 2010 US Open Champion********
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
18,509 Posts
If Fed gets an asterisk for RG, Nadal gets one here, actually he gets 6 asterisks, one for each round of the cakewalk draw. And then a double asterisk for the two spaniard rounds, essentially walkovers, bringing the grand total to 8!

Rafael Nadal: 2010 US Open Champion********
Don't even go there. Federer has won so many clown slams it's unbelievable :eek: Facing tennis juggernauts like Hewitt and Phillipousis in slam finals was sure difficult :rolleyes: Not to mention his pigeon Roddick. I won't even go into one slam finalists like Mugdatis and Gonzalez.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,825 Posts
Rafatards will never let go of Federer's *, yet they won't ever acknowledge the many * that can be placed next to Nadal. It's called bad faith.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,014 Posts
Federer won fair and square in 09. There's no doubt about that. Do I think he would've won if Rafa was there? Probably not. Still, he won and he deserved it. Same goes for this years USO and Nadal not facing Murray.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,797 Posts
The difference is nadal has beaten Roger in a hard court slam bit Roger never beat nadal in a clay court slam...
QFT.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,825 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,643 Posts
ask agassi what he thinks about defeating medvedev in the final

he doesnt care, he beat the runner-up and that says it all
 

·
POWER...UNLIMITED...POWER
Joined
·
5,067 Posts
Too simple, actually simplistic. Nadal did not make the FO final the year Federer won it. If you are not good enough to make the final, it is a stretch to imagine you would beat the eventual champ. No?
Wow...the lack of logic is pathetic
Grow up Fedtard
 

·
Onwards and Upwards!
Joined
·
46,340 Posts

·
Onwards and Upwards!
Joined
·
46,340 Posts
Nadaltards will never stop moaning about RG 09.

Soderling def. Nadal 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(2).

Ouch, still stings, doesn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: star

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,400 Posts
Nadaltards will never stop moaning about RG 09.

Soderling def. Nadal 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(2).

Ouch, still stings, doesn't it?

The real Nadal fans are much more interested in the US Open final right now. Where's Murray btw? :scratch:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,825 Posts
The real Nadal fans are much more interested in the US Open final right now. Where's Murray btw? :scratch:
Fans are fans,

tards are tards. vvv
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,179 Posts
Now that Rafa has reached the final and has a chance to win the USO tomorrow, will Nadaltards and Fedhaters finally stop putting an asterisk on Fed winning RG, similarity will the Fedtards and Nadalhaters stop trying to devalue Rafa's win?

If Rafa doesn't have to go through the 5-time champion/6-time finalist to win his first US Open, then tards should stop trying to use the "Roger didn't have to beat Rafa to win his first French Open!!!"> argument.

So basically, can the fans both sides just agree that you play whoever is on the other side of the net and it doesn't matter if you don't beat the multiple time champion as long as you win?
where you fail is, you don't realize that nadal already has a hardcourt slam and that came at the expense of fed.......
 
21 - 40 of 51 Posts
Top