Well would you argue with the derivative from 3 Grass Slams > 0 Clay Slams, then?
grass is slower but not to the degree you claimThere's no such thing as grass anymore. Just green clay.
He is baaaaaack!!!Since Nadaltards still claim that Ralph is better than Nole on grass with both have 2 titles since 08 is the highest level created and beats any level that Nole has ever produced,even 2011, I imagine it will be quite a shock for them when Nole has more Wimbys than him. What are your thoughts on that, Piledriver, brand new thread incoming?
But to answer your question, No, clay will always be his second best surface even though he's won more Wimbys although an argument could be made now that he has an improved first serve.
You can't be crap on grass having made 3 finals at Wimbledon and won two. Be serious and wake up. Some of you biased tennis tards have zero balance and intelligence in your thinking.Djokovic is crap on grass. Having 3 wimbledons is a travesty.
Most players have no chance against him on Clay than on grass.
He peak when Fed was declining, Nadal was still there to stop him on clay.
However pretty sure Murray will stop his 3rd wimby.
Some people have no idea.You can't be crap on grass having made 3 finals at Wimbledon and won two. Be serious and wake up. Some of you biased tennis tards have zero balance and intelligence in your thinking.