Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 1 of 1 Posts

535 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Same conditions, same surfaces, same playing field. Only no big 3. In the era of 32 seeds and Homogenisation, if Sampras and Agassi played this era, how would they have performed? Assuming they were born 10-15 years later, and were entering the 2000-20 eras in their primes.

I feel Agassi would've thrived in these surfaces and probably would have had a winning H2H against Sampras.

He could've won 15-20 slams, while Sampras would've won 8-10 slams.

Murray would've been their main threat, but without big 3, he probably wouldn't have lifted his game to the next level. I'd say he probably still wins only 3-6 slams

Guys like Wawrinka, Cilic, Safin, Hewitt, Roddick, Berdych, Del Potro, Ferrer, Tsonga, Nalbandian, Davydenko would have probably won 1-3 slams.

Agassi would have been the main beneficiary of this era.
1 - 1 of 1 Posts