[mediter]

Its increasingly apparent that the game of the swiss moonballer is getting outdated and younger more enthusiastic challengers are more prepared to discard the dubious legacy of Nalbandian(what is this choker doing on obscure clay courts????) and Ljubicic.

This has raised several questions in the minds of sincere tennis fans as to how the current season will unfold. Several tennis boards on the web are still infested with Fed fanatics who are ready to abuse and stifle the truth at the first opportunity.

But a few courageous individuals of conscience still exist who are prepared to face fire and fight for the sake of truth.This is where an unbiased,excellent judge like myself step in. There are ofcourse individuals like aloimeh(A fan of war criminal arkan) who have copied the transitional champ term from me. But their agenda is dubious since his sole purpose is to promote a serb as champion. Then there are people like hitlerfan who jumps on the latest bandwagon and confuses the fans further.

Here is my verdict, long awaited by really and knowledgeable tennis fans i suppose.

After a thorough factual research and flawless analysis of facts and evidence, and viewing the problem from multiple angles , i think Federer will win only Basel this year. The reason is he has to avoid the wrath of disappointed and frustred swiss fanatics.

I don't see how he can win any other titles this year. He is undoubtedly capable of pulling gigantic upsets (like the huge santoro upset in this year's AO) from time to time.

Ladies and gentlemen,deliverance is coming. the transition will be over.

 

[Xoil]

Go back yodeling in the Swiss Alps you Fedmug, you're done! Transition is over

 

[Adler]

He'll be playing pan flute on the streets of Basel to earn money for living

 

[Ivanatis]

mediter

it's been a while

 

[anon57]

The final verdict from Mediter is in . I wouldn't know what to do without his factual research and flawless analysis of facts and evidence

 

[Aloimeh]

Its increasingly apparent that the game of the swiss moonballer is getting outdated and younger more enthusiastic challengers are more prepared to discard the dubious legacy of Nalbandian(what is this choker doing on obscure clay courts????) and Ljubicic.

This has raised several questions in the minds of sincere tennis fans as to how the current season will unfold. Several tennis boards on the web are still infested with Fed fanatics who are ready to abuse and stifle the truth at the first opportunity.

But a few courageous individuals of conscience still exist who are prepared to face fire and fight for the sake of truth.This is where an unbiased,excellent judge like myself step in. There are ofcourse individuals like aloimeh(A fan of war criminal arkan) who have copied the transitional champ term from me. But their agenda is dubious since his sole purpose is to promote a serb as champion. Then there are people like hitlerfan who jumps on the latest bandwagon and confuses the fans further.

Here is my verdict, long awaited by really and knowledgeable tennis fans i suppose.

After a thorough factual research and flawless analysis of facts and evidence, and viewing the problem from multiple angles , i think Federer will win only Basel this year. The reason is he has to avoid the wrath of disappointed and frustred swiss fanatics.

I don't see how he can win any other titles this year. He is undoubtedly capable of pulling gigantic upsets (like the huge santoro upset in this year's AO) from time to time.

Ladies and gentlemen,deliverance is coming. the transition will be over.

You're an idiot. Not because of what you say about Federer, but because you accuse me of being a fan of Arkan's, which doesn't correspond to the reality as evidenced on the forum you were frequenting. Incapable of countering my arguments with facts and cogent arguments, you used vague social science gymnastics to expound the standard line. How you came up with the theory that I'm a fan of Arkan's, I don't know. That's why your talk about Federer (true although it may be) is worthless - as it comes from a worthless know-nothing poster.

 

[scarecrows]

he'll retire from tennis and will win the Cheese Rolling race

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC5ykhXDDbo

 

[mediter]

Not because of what you say about Federer, but because you accuse me of being a fan of Arkan's,

It was clear from your virulent defence of greater serbia that you cannot be but a fan of arkan and was jumping up and down when his paramilitaries kicked the dead bodies at Bijeljina. you are a closet fan.

Just as i exposed hitlerfan and his hidden admiration for the fuhrer.

Incapable of countering my arguments with facts and cogent arguments, you used vague social science gymnastics to expound the standard line.

One eyed serb. you were countered effectively on all fronts and now venting the frustration of humiliating defeat.

That's why your talk about Federer (true although it may be) is worthless - as it comes from a worthless know-nothing poster.

My methods are irrefutable with thorough assembly of facts and impeccable logic as forummers here would testify in the past year.

 

[platinum]

Win Wimby?

 

[Apemant]

Its increasingly apparent that the game of the swiss moonballer is getting outdated and younger more enthusiastic

You know, you actually give me creeps. What kind of psyche can be so determined to play a role all the time and never take the mask off just for a second, for the sake of truth? (Did you watch Nurse Betty? :devil: )

You remind me of my poor cousin who was simply incapable of producing a single sentence without at least some kind of joke in it, when he was 16. You try to make him say something serious, and he just couldn't (or wouldn't). You appeal to his reason, he cracks you with another oneliner just like that. Somehow I guessed it must have meant he was in a big trouble - and alas, a year later he became a heroin addict. Now, 12 years later, he still struggles with consequences.

Are you in some kind of a problem? Do you need help? Or you simply enjoy all this charade so much? I don't know if I'm more amazed or frustrated by your flawless act.

 

[Blue Heart24]

 

[Stensland]

the thing is: mediter will eventually be right - because fed won't win everything forever. just like stock market bears will be right some time because it won't go up forever.

so he has an easy ride actually. no matter how many slams fed will win in the coming years, mediter will one day when fed loses the no.1 go: "see, told y'all all along".

 

[Apemant]

the thing is: mediter will eventually be right - because fed won't win everything forever. just like stock market bears will be right some time because it won't go up forever.

Come on. You don't actually believe mediter is dead serious and honest? His posts are paradoxical, because his claims are retarded in essence but their form (the way he constructs sentences) indicates an intelligent person. Therefore, he's just acting. These are not his real thoughts. It is possible that his dislike of Federer is the only genuine thing however. The claims, on the other hand, are certainly impossibly exaggerated and he is fully aware of it.

 

[Stensland]

i guess so, but why do it then? it must've cost him time and time's precious, innit? so why bother pissing people off?

 

[Apemant]

i guess so, but why do it then? it must've cost him time and time's precious, innit? so why bother pissing people off?

People are strange :shrug:

It's not that you or I earn anything by posting here. Maybe that's just his idea of having fun. I'm fine with that - except that it freaks me out every now and then LOL

 

[Stensland]

what freaks me out is that he doesn't offer me (us) any hint of humour, sarcasm or irony in his postings - which leaves 5% of me still believing that he's really that stupid.

 

[decrepitude]

Mediter was a famous troll on the old BBC boards (may still be one on the new boards, I don't know, don't go there often). No, I don't for one minute think he is serious, he just likes winding people up.

 

[Apemant]

what freaks me out is that he doesn't offer me (us) any hint of humour, sarcasm or irony in his postings - which leaves 5% of me still believing that he's really that stupid.

Yes, he doesn't offer a single hint - but then again, there is absolutely NO chance that he is stupid. People who would be SO stupid to actually believe what he says would be incapable of constructing sentences longer than 3 words or so.

So, the answer you are looking for is that he probably has vast experience in pulling stunts like this, and it obviously amuses him a great deal.

 

[mediter]

where has the coward Aloimeh disappeared? does he concede he is a fan of arkan and other war criminals?

 

[Aloimeh]

where has the coward Aloimeh disappeared? does he concede he is a fan of arkan and other war criminals?

Isn't this thread about Federer? Why don't you continue blabbing about him instead of going off about Arkan incessantly?

Anyone who read the thread in question could never come up with the conclusion that I support Arkan or his deeds. Yet according to you I was jumping up and down when he was killing people in Bijeljina. I was 7 years old then and didn't even know what or where Bijeljina was.

And while you're obsessing about war criminals, why don't you deal with the British war criminals in Iraq and Afghanistan...