No doubt, zero
I'll have to disagree with my new friend and betting buddy chico.Djokovic 4, Nadal 0.
Both players have won 4 titles combined on slow grass which suits their style. However on a fast, slick grass, I don't believe they would have won 4. The fast grass benefits for players with big serve and attacking tennis, which I believe Federer would have won more than 7 and Roddick could have won 1.
This. Fair enough to give Novak 1, when peaking on the surface.Well, if Agassi can win a Wimbledon on old grass, I have to give Djokovic the benefit of doubt and say, he can snatch one too, most likely 2011.
Nadal however... the close calls during the first week he had all those years when he made the final would probably turn into close losses, which would make him a complete failure on the surface. So it would surprise me a lot, if he even reached a final, much less win it.