Joined
·
117 Posts
I would think had Agassi played in this era instead of the 90s, he would have won more slams. At least a few more than his tally of 8. He was able to win 8 GS when conditions were fast as hell. Just imagine how many Slams he's with courts slowed down. His ROS, backhand would've cause huge trouble to opponents. He would got a way with a weaker serve in these slow conditions.
Guys like Del Potro, Murray, Cilic, Safin, and Wawrinka would never have won slams if Agassi had played along with big 3.
I see Agassi winning 2-3 US opens, 2-3 AO opens, 1-2 Wimbledons(Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer would not have so many Wimbledons if Agassi played. Even absolutely none if Sampras played).
I can see him winning more French Opens as well, probably 2004, 2005,2009,15, and 16.Rest all would have gone to Nadal.
So Agassi would have got around 11-12 GS in this era.
Guys like Del Potro, Murray, Cilic, Safin, and Wawrinka would never have won slams if Agassi had played along with big 3.
I see Agassi winning 2-3 US opens, 2-3 AO opens, 1-2 Wimbledons(Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer would not have so many Wimbledons if Agassi played. Even absolutely none if Sampras played).
I can see him winning more French Opens as well, probably 2004, 2005,2009,15, and 16.Rest all would have gone to Nadal.
So Agassi would have got around 11-12 GS in this era.