It got sent to The Ruins because of 'Thirdwheelovic' in the thread title since mocking nicknames (besides from a few harmless ones like MugX etc.) are not in congruence with the GM rules. As you see this thread keeps in GM since it has Djokovic in the title
That's what i thought, but there are so so many troll threads up about Nadal, in General, that I am not impressed with that as an example of fair moderation.
Sorry, I see huge problems here, again, with what's going down.
The minute Nadal is playing again, it starts. It was very calm during the USO.
So after all the Nadal troll threads went up, some Nadal fans starting putting up Djok troll threads in response.
It happened in exactly that order.
A troll thread is a troll thread, regardless of a mocking name.
Second, there was a very valid thread created called "Why is this place so respectless?" That opened a much needed discussion about the real problem here of chronic bashing of players--not just Nadal, but the general lack of respect shown to great athletes, and of course all the bashing of posters here as well. That thread got locked immediately!!!
This struck me as really censorious, like shut down all conversation on what's wrong here and how we might make it better.
If the mods even care, they need to figure out a different way of improving the quality of discussion on this site.
So very quickly, it becomes impossible to even talk about tennis, it's just all insult hurling and fighting and echh.
You know I have a huge amount of ignores and I still see this.
Something should be done.
You should open a thread for i put on this very subject, and not censor genuine conversation about what's wrong here. Sure, delete or ban all the hurlers of insults, and also please look at who threw the first punch.
There is a tradition here of baiting, then banning the 2nd punch, usually coming form a nadal fan.
'
Also, that terrible "Poll" of most hated poster. This is just disgusting, and mods participate in it! That says more about this place than anything.
Just a few ideas. I respond at length to you because I have some faith in you.