Why no? In some aspect of game - MAY BE he better. He was # 12 in world. Almost Top 10.I am always saying that Hrbaty >>>>>>> Federer and Nadal. Here is the proof :worship:
Malvin is also geniuos og game and always was./.Why no? In some aspect of game - MAY BE he better. He was # 12 in world. Almost Top 10.
Mahut was only # 37 on pick! It is not same thing! Mahut even potencially barely Top 40 player... But he's geniuos og game and always was./.
But Simon has just beaten Mahut, so Simon > Mahut > Nadal, DJoko, Roger no ? :devil:Mahut 3-0 Wawrinka.
Stan has just beaten Nadal, Federer, and Djokovic
So, Nicolas > Rafa, Roger, and Nole, obviously?