i felt like every year theres always that 1 or 2 guys (nicolai and gasquet this year) that just doesnt make it that interesting
if gasquet sucks why Murray wasn't able to defeat him ??i felt like every year theres always that 1 or 2 guys (nicolai and gasquet this year) that just doesnt make it that interesting
So smart that he has yet to win a match against Nadal,Djokovic and Gasquet and so smart that he lost to Robredo(a poor man's Ferrer) 6-0 3-6 2-6 recentlyyea thats true, murray is a pretty smart player though, but in that match it didnt look like gasquet was using his head much
Agree with this - I would rather Murray than Gasquet there, but Murray had his chance and blew it so there's no point bellyaching about it now.Fact: I wanted to see Muza on TMC too, but he had his chance, direct showdown with Richard and he failed, no need to speak more
:yeah:It would have been better if Murray and Nalbandian were here instead of some others as they are much fresher, having both missed chunks of the season. Sure both would have put up a much better show than some of the other mugs - especially Djoko and Davy who look like the last place they want to be is in Shanghai.
However, Nalbandian only has himself to blame for being such a lazy mug for most of the season and Murray, well he was unlucky with injuries, otherwise Gasquet wouldn't have a hope of being in Shanghai regardless of their match in Paris.
Dammit- and I was just going to pm you about this, because I was confused. I should have known. You trick people.
:spit: 'brain problems' :rolls:Muzza had 6 months of injury problems
followed by 2 months of brain problems in French tournaments
both things cost him his place.
Yep, that's the best punctuation! :yeah: :hatoff:I read the title about five different ways, inserting my own punctuation. I agree with those above who thought "Gasquet Sucks Murray - Would've Made it More Interesting" was the best choice. Huzzah.