Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 86 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
98 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
By Glenn Moore:

When a woman's gotta go, she's gotta go. Except that when Serena Williams
was offered the chance to take a "comfort break" in her remarkable
third-round match against Daniela Hantuchova at Wimbledon on Monday night
she suddenly did not need to go after all.

Williams' selective need to visit the bathroom has prompted allegations of
gamesmanship. Some critics have even suggested she also faked the calf
injury that added such a dramatic air to her victory.

The last charge is ludicrous. Williams' yelp of pain, and her collapse to
the turf, was obviously genuine. That she only wanted to go for a toilet
break when her opponent was about to serve (which is no longer permitted),
and not when she was about to serve does seem more Machiavellian.

If so it was hardly a new development, nor even an extreme one. Forget the
strawberries and cream, "oh I say, anyone for tennis?" image of the nation's
most middle-class pastime. At its professional heart, lawn tennis is as
devious as any other sport. This is a sport where many players, of all
levels, keep a copy of Brad Gilbert's Winning Ugly in their kit-bag, a book
which devotes 63 pages to "mind games, psyching out and gamesmanship".

Nick Bollettieri, the legendary coach and Independent columnist, has seen
most of the tricks in his half-century in the game. "There is no way on this
earth that Serena's cramp had anything to do with gamesmanship," he said.
"Her calf was swollen like a grapefruit. As for the toilet break, I don't
know. It's a thin line. I'm sure she needed the bathroom, and I can accept
that as she took control of the match, she wanted to stay on court.

"There was` more obvious gamesmanship in Rafael Nadal's match with Robin
Soderling. Nadal was playing with his pants, pulling up his socks, bouncing
the ball 30 or 40 times or something ridiculous. Then Soderling was
mimicking Nadal."

Many in the game feel Nadal's timewasting is gamesmanship. Players are
supposed to play at the speed of the server, but Nadal dictates his own
tempo. So does Maria Sharapova who, between every point, turns to the back
of the court, fiddles with her racquet strings, then deigns to serve or
receive. It would be a bold player who served regardless to someone of the
stature of Nadal or Sharapova.

The men can only take toilet breaks at the end of a set. But that is also
open to abuse. Eyebrows were also raised at the eight-minute break Feliciano
Lopez required after losing the fourth set against Tim Henman. The delay
broke Henman's rhythm and Lopez won the fifth.

The use of Hawk-Eye challenges, and injury time-outs are other potential
sources of gamesmanship but, adds Bollettieri, "in a historical context,
this is Mickey Mouse stuff compared to the great gamesmen. I mean Jimmy
Connors, John McEnroe, Ilie Nastase. Now that was gamesmenship, and the
crowds loved it. McEnroe always questioned the umpire. Connors had rages of
terror. And it was all controlled. Nastase just glared at everybody. These
guys knew what they were doing."

McEnroe has admitted many of his outbursts were calculated to upset his
opponent, while even the joking antics of a Nastase, or Henri Leconte, can
have the same effect. As for Connors, in Winning Ugly Gilbert recalls an
encounter in a Chicago tournament.

In the final set Gilbert, with match-point on Connors' serve, hit a winner.
He recalled Connors was "so mad stuff was coming out of his nose and he was
spitting at the mouth". Indicating a supposed mark he screamed abuse at the
line judge and umpire. To Gilbert's shock and horror the umpire suddenly
announced an overrule. Gilbert, to no avail, protested. He failed to win
another point as Connors won the match.

This appears closer to cheating than gamesmanship, the art of which was
first defined (and labelled) in Stephen Potter's 1947 book, Gamesmanship:
The Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating.

Potter describes how to interrupt an opponent's flow, or distract him,
ideally while appearing sporting. Thus, though fidgeting while your opponent
addresses the ball at the tee-box is unsporting, asking loudly for quiet so
your opponent can concentrate appears sporting but achieves the same effect.

But surely golf, the game in which players police themselves, is clean?
Downright cheating is extremely rare but gamesmanship occurs, albeit more
often among club players than pros.

The most notorious incidents have tended to come in the Ryder Cup, perhaps
because players become more emotionally involved. The American stampede
across Jose Maria Olazabal's line at Brookline in 1999 is perhaps the most
infamous event but that could be put down to the heat of the moment. Eight
years prior the animosity between Paul Azinger and Seve Ballesteros included
the American calling the Spaniard, who had coughed throughout the round,
"the King of gamesmanship".

This was gentle compared to the 1969 match at Royal Birkdale. A fourball
pitting Bernhard Gallacher and Brian Huggett against Dave Hill and Ken Still
became confrontational as early as the first green. Huggett told both
opponents off for their movement and positioning. On the next green Still
loudly ordered his caddie not to hold the flag for Gallacher. The quartet
simmered until Hill missed a putt at the seventh and holed out only for
Gallacher to note he had putted out of turn. Still replied: "You can have
the hole and the goddamn Cup."

On the eighth Gallacher, in a brilliant exposition of Potter's dictum about
appearing to be sporting, while actually being unsporting, conceded Still's
putt. This denied Hill, who was in position to win the hole, a chance to
read the line. Eventually Hill allegedly told Gallacher: "If you say one
more word I'm going to wrap this one-iron around your head." The Americans
won on the 17th. Hill refused to shake hands with the referee.

Such behaviour is "just not cricket", except cricket is hardly exempt. If
appealing when the batsman is not out, or claiming a grounded catch, is
really cheating, bowlers going off for a breather after a long spell, or
creating footmarks for their spinners, are more akin to gamesmanship. Then
there is sledging, a technique calculated to break an opponent's
concentration. Even administrators indulge, deliberately creating wickets to
suit their side's attack.

Other sports are similarly affected. Footballers habitually appeal for a
throw-in, or corner, when they know the ball went out of play off
themselves; some "dive" in an attempt to hoodwink referees. Gamesmanship -
or cheating. And what of the dark arts of the rugby scrum?

How, too, do we categorise the more infamous shunts in Formula One? When
Alain Prost drove Ayrton Senna off the track at Suzuka in 1989, and Michael
Schumacher crashed into Damon Hill at Adelaide in 1994, in both cases
ensuring they took the Championship, were they showing gamesmanship, or a
reckless disregard for safety?

Such acts make Serena Williams' request look mild. Besides, Hantchukova
should have had the steel to ignore her.

"In pro sports, small margins matter, so players use any advantage within
the rules, gamesmanship included," Bollettieri concluded. "But the bottom
line for any pro is get the job done. If you're good enough to be out there,
you have to be strong enough, focused enough, to think only of the ball, the
point, the match. Block distractions out and they're not going to hurt you."

http://sport.independent.co.uk/tennis/article2733202.ece
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
890 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Unfortunately, more and more people support cheating in sport. And it seems to be ok for players to get away with things. Nobleness and class is not supported anymore :sad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
193 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Serena was genuinely hurt, its disgusting to suggest otherwise.


But lets get real, if that was me and i had a very slim chance of winning, i'd personally use every tactic within the rules to keep myself in the tournament and towards history. Yes its unsporting, i admit but that cant be helped sometimes. Its very nieve and spectatorish to be all moral and say that you wouldnt in their shoes....be honest.....

Henin holding her hand up & cheating Williams out of a serve a few years ago was a shocker though, lol!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
162 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

I am 100% honest in saying that I wouldn't resort to dirty tactics if I were a pro sporter. I'm also glad that there are players who think the same way I do.

Not all do though, which is obvious. The only naive thing is to presume that everybody would display sportsmanship. There's nothing naive in being honorable yourself. It's obnoxious to presume that other people can't be more honorable than you on a playing field.

There's nothing wrong with not approving unsporstmanship behaviour. People are allowed to prefer honor over effectivity.
 

·
Forum Umpire:, Gaston Gaudio,
Joined
·
124,507 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

If a player is good enough then they don't need the antics.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
711 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Unfortunately, more and more people support cheating in sport. And it seems to be ok for players to get away with things. Nobleness and class is not supported anymore :sad:
I hate all this yearning for the past, and "in the good old days" crap. Does anyone seriously think it was any different then?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,459 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Unfortunately, more and more people support cheating in sport. And it seems to be ok for players to get away with things. Nobleness and class is not supported anymore :sad:
'Honor' is the word you were searching for. Yes, there is no honor today at all, but curiously enough, I'm not sure honor ever existed in the first place. Maybe honor was always just something to brag about in public. Maybe being 'honorable' was only something that people strived to be publicly acknowledged as. But being honorable within, does it matter? Did it ever matter? I'm not sure. I dig deep within myself and I'm still not sure. Does integrity matter even if noone knows about it? Or it is all just vanity, as the old saying goes?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,454 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

I think people find the William's sisters a bit histrionic, so they get suspicious of their actions. I remember their first Wimbledon final the commentators even thought they may be fixing it.

It was totally ridiculous of course, but sometimes the way they go on they don't do themselves any favours.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
985 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

'Honor' is the word you were searching for. Yes, there is no honor today at all, but curiously enough, I'm not sure honor ever existed in the first place. Maybe honor was always just something to brag about in public. Maybe being 'honorable' was only something that people strived to be publicly acknowledged as. But being honorable within, does it matter? Did it ever matter? I'm not sure. I dig deep within myself and I'm still not sure. Does integrity matter even if noone knows about it? Or it is all just vanity, as the old saying goes?
It matters. Following the dictates of conscience is always better than smothering it with justifications. Just an all around better way to live and sport past and present has been full of great champions that were courteous and straight up, in spite of the McEnroes, Conners, Nastases, etc. that Brad Gilbert chooses to focus on...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,626 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

If a player is good enough then they don't need the antics.
True, but on the other hand also: if a player is good enough (which includes all departements) the opponent can do whatever they want and he still wins the match.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,538 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

I am 100% honest in saying that I wouldn't resort to dirty tactics if I were a pro sporter.
That's easy to say when you are NOT a pro player. At that level, you have to find ways to get into your opponent's head. Mind-fucking is part of any sport and to get to the top you have to either learn how to do it well (like Nadal), or learn how to be impervious to it (like Federer before Nadal moved into his head).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,459 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

It matters. Following the dictates of conscience is always better than smothering it with justifications. Just an all around better way to live and sport past and present has been full of great champions that were courteous and straight up, in spite of the McEnroes, Conners, Nastases, etc. that Brad Gilbert chooses to focus on...
Umm, like I said, it definitely matters to 'appear' honorable (for how long it will matter, we'll see :devil: ). While I wondered if it mattered to be honorable within - as opposed to being honorable only when there are witnesses. Some people go great lengths to defend their image of being honorable within (in the past, it was mandatory: you couldn't afford losing your 'honor' in public), even if they are actually corrupted to the bone. In that sense, I would actually prefer the likes of McEnroes etc - because at least you know who you are dealing with.

Read Dostojevski when you find time - if you didn't already ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,978 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Unfortunately, more and more people support cheating in sport. And it seems to be ok for players to get away with things. Nobleness and class is not supported anymore :sad:
Gamesmanship has been around for ages. Bill Tilden and Suzanne Lenglen were very prone to taking time outs just to preen themselves when it suited them to change the match dynamics. There is all of this call for the good old days- but I am not sure if there ever was this idyllic time in tennis where there was no gamesmanship and everything was sunshine and flowers. I don't see how there is a lowering of class in the game right now in comparison to any time that I have watched it since 1980. With players- there will always be gimmicks. It just seems to me- at least imo- that nowadays there is this idealized vision of the past that from what I can see did not exist.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,159 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

I believe Serena was genuinely hurt but after that long break I also expected her .

I found her argument for a bathroom break to be reasonable , despite the fact that she had been in the locker room all along before the warm-up.

What was alarming was that after arguing fervently for a bathroom break because she had had to drink so much fluids to alleviate her condition, the umpire had to remind Serena after she had broken Hantuchova, that she wanted a bathroom break just a game before.

That was gamesmanship, IMO. I mean needing to take a piss real bad is something you have little control over and unless Serena pissed herself on the court and nobody saw she was definitely playing some games there.

There is another instance recently where I found her actions questionable but to be honest I can't remember the circumstances.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,747 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

True, but on the other hand also: if a player is good enough (which includes all departements) the opponent can do whatever they want and he still wins the match.
Agreed. Connors was the king of gamesmanship. He'd intentionally get US crowds cheering as loudly as possible to throw his opponent off. Yes well...this is tennis.
 

·
Forum Umpire:, Gaston Gaudio,
Joined
·
124,507 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

True, but on the other hand also: if a player is good enough (which includes all departements) the opponent can do whatever they want and he still wins the match.
Just remember that when you bitched about Gonzalez aiming a ball at Hewitt at the net.

Lucky, where I play we have ways of handling cheats and gamesmanship antics, not always pretty but effective.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
317 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Serena was hurt. :shrug: Who knows how badly she had to go. There are times when I want to pee (even take a crap for that matter) and I can manage to hold it in. it's evident that she didn't want to go that badly. She had the momentum at 4-2. Perhaps she didn't want to break it. It frustrates me when people criticize continuously and carry-on as if they're the most modest people in this world. Don't act as if you wouldn't utilize gamesmanship. Especially when the moment is as big as it is. :eek:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
985 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

Umm, like I said, it definitely matters to 'appear' honorable (for how long it will matter, we'll see :devil: ). While I wondered if it mattered to be honorable within - as opposed to being honorable only when there are witnesses. Some people go great lengths to defend their image of being honorable within (in the past, it was mandatory: you couldn't afford losing your 'honor' in public), even if they are actually corrupted to the bone. In that sense, I would actually prefer the likes of McEnroes etc - because at least you know who you are dealing with.

Read Dostojevski when you find time - if you didn't already ;)
I totally agree. :)Yea, have slacked off my reading, will pick up the Russian again, has been years..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,022 Posts
Re: The Art of Gamesmanship : winning without cheating

i tend to forget cheaters but not those big-time ones like henin and hewitt
 
1 - 20 of 86 Posts
Top