Grow up.
For those who were asterisking AO 2022 and other titles, are we also asterisking RG 2023?
Discuss. Some on here have been super insufferable with asterisking every tournament Djokovic didn’t play in last year. I want to see if they will apply the same standards here
1 - 20 of 279 Posts
Im not asterisking anything. I’m seeing if the asterisk crowd is going to apply the same standards hereGrow up.
There are no asterisks in tennis
None
None
A certain sect of people were screaming asterisk for every tournament Djokovic didn’t play in last year though 🤣, but I wonder if they are consistent at leastThere are no asterisks in tennis
None
Intresting you are not asking about US open22
I wonder why hmm
I wonder why hmm
I said “and other titles”.. AO 2022 was where the talk started.Intresting you are not asking about US open22
I wander why hmm
Ignore themA certain sect of people were screaming asterisk for every tournament Djokovic didn’t play in last year though 🤣, but I wonder if they are consistent at least
They are in their own world
Let them live there
Of course not lol. Irony and hypocrisy don't exist in a certain fanbase dictionary lol.Discuss. Some on here have been super insufferable with asterisking every tournament Djokovic didn’t play in last year. I want to see if they will apply the same standards here
Of course as I have been saying for months their arguments helped ensure Nadal as undisputed GOAT forever (depending what Alcaraz goes on to do).
Djokovic is an irrelevance at USO in terms of winning it has been for half a decade.Intresting you are not asking about US open22
I wonder why hmm
lol of course no. only nadal is absent and he is injured, so
There are no asterisks, all Slams were won fair and square, heck, even most people consider Thiem's 2020 Slam abomination a fair slam, or the 2003-2007 Fed's Slam collection.
Asterisk is when a healthy player and a past (multiple) winner is absent, even though he is willing to play. There is no such thing at RG23.Discuss. Some on here have been super insufferable with asterisking every tournament Djokovic didn’t play in last year. I want to see if they will apply the same standards here
I thought you said you refrained from trollingThere are no asterisks, all Slams were won fair and square, heck, even most people consider Thiem's 2020 Slam abomination a fair slam, or the 2003-2007 Fed's Slam collection.
He was not eligible to play in the country through his choice. He wasn’t singled out lol. He could have played if he wanted to. It’s not like he was banned over nationality or something he couldn’t controlAsterisk is when a healthy player and a past (multiple) winner is absent, even though he is willing to play. There is no such thing at RG23.
i mean the most asterisked slam would be that one banning players from certain nationalities and giving 0 atp points...that´s the only slam i would asterisk because it felt like an exhibition
exactly. thanks for pointing the obvious. because the obvious, is not obvious for nolefam if it goes against their godHe was not eligible to play in the country through his choice. He wasn’t singled out lol. He could have played if he wanted to. It’s not like he was banned over nationality
Yeah, I don’t understand how some portray him as a victim during last year. You can agree or disagree with the mandates, but at the end of the day, he didn’t fulfill the requirements to enter some countries and others did. Even he said that he accepts the consequencesexactly. thanks for pointing the obvious. because the obvious, is not obvious for nolefam if it goes against their god
Nadal wasn't the favourite for RG even before he got injured and pulled out. He looks pretty much done. Novak was the overwhelming favourite for AO.
1 - 20 of 279 Posts
Mens Tennis Forums
A forum community dedicated to male tennis players and enthusiasts. Talk about everything from the ATP, NSMTA, to college Tennis and even everything about equipment. It's all here!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Recommended Communities
