[The Oracle]

It may sound strange since Pete usually sucks on slow surfaces, but I think this is still the case. What other reason can there be for Federer to let Pete win?

 

[senorgato]

Money. How else are they going to secure future exhibitions between these two if Fed swept all 3 matches? Who's going to be interested in seeing that again?

Plus, it's only an exhibition. Fed didn't even play his hardest in non-Slam tournaments this year.

 

[VolandriFan]

The progressive scorelines are a dead giveaway. Also the fact that none of the matches, although close, went to 3 sets for grandpa Pete.

 

[ChinoRios4Ever]

Dont take this seriously, it's only an exo

 

[Marek.]

Just Cause, come out of hiding already.

 

[The Oracle]

What does Just Cause have to do with Federer losing on purpose?

 

[Roddickominator]

Federer's loss was due to Sampras being a superior player.

 

[star]

Exhibition forum, please.

 

[rosamunda]

Er.....I thought the Macao surface has been deemed the fastest in the galaxy ever.

 

[World Beater]

Er.....I thought the Macao surface has been deemed the fastest in the galaxy ever.

the oracle lives in a different galaxy. one where federer is overrated and where her darling sampras won RG and became GOAT.