Take a guess at the ending h2h between Federer and Roddick... Go on, be wild, have a go!
Because Fed stopped Roddick in so many big matches, just like Sampras did to Henman. At least a couple of Wimbledon semis would have probably gone different for Tim w/out Pete there. Difference is, Roddick is a better player, so he gets to the match w/Fed more than Henman did in his and Sampras' time. But, I'm sure Henman would've won Wimbledon once or maybe twice w/out Pete in the way, just like Andy would have.I dont see how Henmans 1-6 against Sampras makes him a classic turkey like Gilbert to Lendl or Roddick to Federer.