At least he is there playing them even when he isn't playing so good, I remember at Rome one year he was beyond atrocious and reached the final, of course lost to Nadal very easy but still deserves it's praise others dream of making a Masters final and he does it like it's nothing.
yah, well. at least nole was able to beat rafa in a rome final, back then in '11. we all know fed was useless against rafa on clay, no need for you to rub it in even further.
Well you see, the difference between Federer and pusher is that Federer grinds and fights past Millman and Sandgren injured just to get an obvious beating in the semifinals while the Serbian is hiding at the first sign of adversity against Chung, Istomin or Berdych because he isn't at his best and avoids Federer.
Well you see, the difference between Federer and pusher is that Federer grinds and fights past Millman and Sandgren injured just to get an obvious beating in the semifinals while the Serbian is hiding at the first sign of adversity against Chung, Istomin or Berdych because he isn't at his best and avoids Federer.
so that's fed excuse? he was grinding injured against mugs while never being able to win in rome despite trying a whopping 16 times already in his career so far?
what a hero, this fed...
duh. isn't it djokovic to have well above 80 percent winning percentage across all surfaces and events these days?
wonder if OP could back up the claim with some numbers instead of a cringey gif. not holding my breath tho...
Nothing random about winning 75% matches in the the 3 main categories of tournaments that your fellow big 3 members FAILED to do. Novax came up short this time. Sorry...
Yeah awpee, the enlightened know Fred has had the best game overall regardless of the weak hoarding on display in recent years. The rest don't, because they are deluded mugs indeed. Nothing else to see here.
Appreciate the likes and stuff dude, but not this post unfortunately. Djokotards like stats and I gave em some. Fed fans don't have to always have their nose in the air.
the fact is that nole is in the top 3 of all time in W% on all 4 slams (1st in AO and 3rd in other 3, fed is 4th in AO, 8th in RG, 4th in W and 2nd in USO))! which is a clearly better achievement!
the fact is that nole is in the top 3 of all time in W% on all 4 slams (1st in AO and 3rd in other 3, fed is 4th in AO, 8th in RG, 4th in W and 2nd in USO))! which is a clearly better achievement!
Why would you or anyone make an attempt of trying to compare their winning percentage when both are still active and playing, you realize another couple losses at Wimbledon and the Serbian will be trailing Federer right? Hilarious half arsed stats that don't even make sense if both aren't retired and done playing, Djokotards really are desperate and brainless.
Federer was 20-1 at Masters 1000s in 2017, but he was absent at more than half of the Masters events in that season. Highly selective scheduling has done wonders to favourably skew the overall percentage at these tournaments to his advantage - kudos to him.
Well, it was a very tight schedule for a player in his 36th years old, although he doesn't escape the injury in Canada, which could happen at any time during this season.
It will be interesting to see Nadal at the same age next year, and for Djokovic in 2 years.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Mens Tennis Forums
18.5M posts
87.7K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to male tennis players and enthusiasts. Talk about everything from the ATP, NSMTA, to college Tennis and even everything about equipment. It's all here!