At least he is there playing them even when he isn't playing so good, I remember at Rome one year he was beyond atrocious and reached the final, of course lost to Nadal very easy but still deserves it's praise others dream of making a Masters final and he does it like it's nothing.
the fact is that nole is in the top 3 of all time in W% on all 4 slams (1st in AO and 3rd in other 3, fed is 4th in AO, 8th in RG, 4th in W and 2nd in USO))! which is a clearly better achievement!
OK, but GOAT points are just a simple single figure to represent achievements. Most of the time they are pretty accurate in measuring player achievements, like in this case. You can always find corner cases when they do not represent the best single figure value, but you can say that to all single-figure values.
Interestingly enough, it is more often that 'common understanding' about some tennis proportion is questionable (i.e. a myth) than that UTS GOAT points tell wrong thing . That is why they are available at UTS.
OK, but GOAT points are just a simple single figure to represent achievements. Most of the time they are pretty accurate in measuring player achievements, like in this case. You can always find corner cases when they do not represent the best single figure value, but you can say that to all single-figure values.
Interestingly enough, it is more often that 'common understanding' about some tennis proportion is questionable (i.e. a myth) than that UTS GOAT points tell wrong thing . That is why they are available at UTS.
the fact is that nole is in the top 3 of all time in W% on all 4 slams (1st in AO and 3rd in other 3, fed is 4th in AO, 8th in RG, 4th in W and 2nd in USO))! which is a clearly better achievement!
Why would you or anyone make an attempt of trying to compare their winning percentage when both are still active and playing, you realize another couple losses at Wimbledon and the Serbian will be trailing Federer right? Hilarious half arsed stats that don't even make sense if both aren't retired and done playing, Djokotards really are desperate and brainless.
Seems like you care about it much more. People in Serbia have much more things to think about than what happened in Olympics. It was a news for one day, people in Serbia don't give two shits over such trivial things.
the fact is that nole is in the top 3 of all time in W% on all 4 slams (1st in AO and 3rd in other 3, fed is 4th in AO, 8th in RG, 4th in W and 2nd in USO))! which is a clearly better achievement!
The truth is that AO (played; Federer 117- Djokovic 90) and Wimbledon (Fed 119- Djok 89) are not comparable
27 and 30 matches apart!
Which is logical given that the 2 are 6 years apart.
The matches played closer for RG (Fed 90- Djo 96: + 6 Nole) and US Open (Fed 103 -Djo 94: + 9 Fed) are justified by the absence of Federer at RG (4) and US Open (3), even if Djokovic also skipped an edition in 2017.
AO and Wimb, only Federer has played more than 100 matches (117-119), to date.
in RG, only Nadal (108)
at the US Open, only Connors (115) and Federer (103)
At YEC
Federer 76 matches played (59-17)
Djokovic 54 (38-16)
Lendl 50 (40-10)
Seems like you care about it much more. People in Serbia have much more things to think about than what happened in Olympics. It was a news for one day, people in Serbia don't give two shits over such trivial things.
A forum community dedicated to male tennis players and enthusiasts. Talk about everything from the ATP, NSMTA, to college Tennis and even everything about equipment. It's all here!