Joined
·
1,271 Posts
Nadal is 2nd and Djokovic is 7th. Clearly, Nadal and Djokovic are far better players mentally.
https://www.atptour.com/en/stats/break-points-converted
https://www.atptour.com/en/stats/break-points-converted
A 3% difference in converting BP's when compared to arguably the two best returners the game has seen isn't too bad.
Great first post,new user.Filter by surface and see that Nadal's return stats are heavily weighted for clay where we all know he plays his best tennis. He is 46th on hard courts.
All of the top break point converters are obviously going to be clay courters because their game is based around winning the majority of their points in rallies rather than relying on their serves.
Federer still awful though. Sampras is even lower. Their games are more serve based.
Yeah, he was easily the worst player in taking bp, but he improved this year. He actually is 10/15 in ATP Finals this year.I don't know about Fed but seeing who is last make me laught. Thiem one of the best clay courters today and recently hardcourter last in break point conversion is hilarious.
Nasals return stats are due to him being superior once the rally gets underway but his actual return isn’t anything special, he generally just tried to put it back in play in a decent enough position to start a neutral rally.Filter by surface and see that Nadal's return stats are heavily weighted for clay where we all know he plays his best tennis. He is 46th on hard courts.
All of the top break point converters are obviously going to be clay courters because their game is based around winning the majority of their points in rallies rather than relying on their serves.
Federer still awful though. Sampras is even lower. Their games are more serve based.
YEC 2003 to YEC 2007 42.50 which puts him on 43rd in the above listWhat was his BP conversion rate from YEC 2003 to AO 2010, more specifically YEC 2003 to YEC 2007?