Mens Tennis Forums banner
1 - 20 of 27 Posts

Registered
Joined
1,271 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
  • Like
Reactions: 80361

Registered
Joined
6,930 Posts
On return of serve, you are by definition on the back foot trying to get into a neutral rally. Djokovic and Nadal are superior defenders than Roger, and hence better at working themselves into a position to win the point against the server
 

Registered
Joined
96 Posts
Rafa - 44.96%
Novak - 44.39%
Roger - 41.20%

I'd have thought Federer would be even worse than that tbh.

A 3% difference in converting BP's when compared to arguably the two best returners the game has seen isn't too bad. I guess his lack of BP conversion has been happening in high profile matches which makes it look like he's having trouble with BP's when in truth it's not too bad.
 

Registered
Joined
6,423 Posts
We all know that Nadal and Djokovic are better returners than Federer, and that Federer is not particularly good at converting break points, so this is not surprising.
Break points saved:
7) Roger Federer 67.29%
10) Rafael Nadal 66.66%
20) Novak Djokovic 65.44%
 

Registered
Joined
10,899 Posts
Obviously Guillermo Coria is the GOAT. Thanks OP.
 

Registered
Joined
8,231 Posts
This make Rafa even better.
We can all agree that Federer , then Nole are much better servers then Rafa. They get alot more easy points.
So the gap should be much closer. And it isnt.
 

Registered
Joined
349 Posts
Filter by surface and see that Nadal's return stats are heavily weighted for clay where we all know he plays his best tennis. He is 46th on hard courts.

All of the top break point converters are obviously going to be clay courters because their game is based around winning the majority of their points in rallies rather than relying on their serves.

Federer still awful though. Sampras is even lower. Their games are more serve based.
 

Registered
Joined
8,759 Posts
Filter by surface and see that Nadal's return stats are heavily weighted for clay where we all know he plays his best tennis. He is 46th on hard courts.

All of the top break point converters are obviously going to be clay courters because their game is based around winning the majority of their points in rallies rather than relying on their serves.

Federer still awful though. Sampras is even lower. Their games are more serve based.
Great first post,new user.
 

Registered
Joined
5,331 Posts
we all knew he's just a glorified servebot tho, so this isn't exactly brandnew information.
 

Registered
Joined
5,873 Posts
I don't know about Fed but seeing who is last make me laught. Thiem one of the best clay courters today and recently hardcourter last in break point conversion is hilarious.
Yeah, he was easily the worst player in taking bp, but he improved this year. He actually is 10/15 in ATP Finals this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paca

Banned
Joined
3,346 Posts
Filter by surface and see that Nadal's return stats are heavily weighted for clay where we all know he plays his best tennis. He is 46th on hard courts.

All of the top break point converters are obviously going to be clay courters because their game is based around winning the majority of their points in rallies rather than relying on their serves.

Federer still awful though. Sampras is even lower. Their games are more serve based.
Nasals return stats are due to him being superior once the rally gets underway but his actual return isn鈥檛 anything special, he generally just tried to put it back in play in a decent enough position to start a neutral rally.
 

Registered
Joined
2,987 Posts
So out of 100 BP opportunities Rafa and Nole would convert 3 more times, not that big of a difference considering the stats include the last few years where Federer has been struggling.
 

Registered
Joined
8,759 Posts
What was his BP conversion rate from YEC 2003 to AO 2010, more specifically YEC 2003 to YEC 2007?
YEC 2003 to YEC 2007 42.50 which puts him on 43rd in the above list
YEC 2003 to AO 2010 42.16 which puts him on 55th on the list.
 
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top