Joined
·
5,067 Posts
It seems like everyone on this forum is either black or white on the issue of Fed. Some people seem to hate his guts for constantly winning all the time. Others love him for his undeniable talent.
So is he the hero who will usher tennis into a golden age.
Or is he the villain who will destroy tennis by his dominance.
For people who don't like metaphors:
Is Roger good for the ATP's popularity or bad for it?
So is he the hero who will usher tennis into a golden age.
Or is he the villain who will destroy tennis by his dominance.
For people who don't like metaphors:
Is Roger good for the ATP's popularity or bad for it?