Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 20 of 59 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
In the ATPWorldTour Player Performance Zone, they have stats for match win indexes (which is the percentage of matches won in a given situation like slams / finals / grasscourts / etc)
I have pasted some of the most important stats below, and also added a few more general important stats (like slam titles, masters titles, etc).

I have removed any players who were from before the Open Era.

Observations:
1. Djokovic has surpassed (or equalled) Fed in all of the match win index stats, except for grass court record. This is really impressive. Just looking at the match win indexes, one could place Novak in the top 3 (or top 4 in the worst case) players in the Open Era.
2. Fed's match win index record has declined as he has aged obviously, and Novak's will also decline as his level of play declines with age. But hopefully he can improve the record further for a couple years before the decline begins. Even then, he will likely end up with numbers worse than this in the match win index stats.
3. The general overall stats is where Fed shines -- like slam titles, weeks at No. 1 etc. These are the ones that make him the GOAT player. Novak could catch him on a few of these stats though like Year-End No. 1. He already has more masters titles.
4. Djokovic may always be behind in number of slam titles, however, in terms of slam finals reached, he is almost certain to overtake all players except Fed.
5. Novak has a 20-20 head-to-head against Fed, and 21-23 against Rafa. He is almost certain to convert those to winning records against both of them shortly. Obviously Djokovic is younger than Fed, but still his soon-to-be-winning records against them would contribute towards placing Novak in his place in history.
6. In my view, Novak was always uncertain of winning against Fed, and used to rely on him not playing well. But I feel in the Wimbledon final he finally, finally realized how to beat him even when he is playing well. From now on, Novak is likely to win most of his matches against Fed.
7. Djokovic is one of all time great players.

====
Match Win Index Stats


Overall Match Win Index
Nadal 83.0
Borg 82.7
Djoko 82.0
Connors 81.9
Lendl 81.8
Fed 81.6
McEnroe
Laver
Sampras

Grand Slam Match Win Index
Borg: 89.8
Nadal: 87.5
Fed: 85.8
Djoko: 85.5

Laver: 84.9
Sampras: 84.2
Connors:
Lendl

Masters Win Index
Nadal: 83.1
Djoko: 81.6
Fed: 77.3

Agassi: 74.1
Sampras: 73.1
Edberg
Murray


Vs Top 10 Match Win Index:
Borg 70.0
Nadal 66.5
Djoko 65.3
Fed 65.2

Becker
Lendl
Sampras

Clay Win Index
Nadal: 91.9
Borg: 86.0
Lendl: 81.4
Vilas: 80.3
Djoko: 79.6
Connors: 77.5
Muster
Wilander
Fed: 76.2

Hard Win Index
Djoko: 83.3
Fed: 83.1

Connors: 83.0
Lendl: 82.6
Laver: 81.3
McEnroe: 81.2
Sampras: 80.4
Agassi: 79.0
Edberg: 78.6
Murray: 77.9
Nadal: 77.5

Grass Win Index
Fed: 87.7
McEnroe: 85.6
Borg: 84.7
Murray: 83.8
Sampras: 83.5
Connors: 83.3
Laver: 82.7
Becker: 82.3
Djoko: 81.7

======
General Records

Weeks at Number 1:
Fed 302
Sampras 286
Lendl 270
Connors 268
McEnroe 170
Djoko 155
Nadal 141


Year-End No. 1:
Sampras 6
Fed 5
Connors 5
McEnroe 4
Lendl 4
Nadal 3
Djokovic 3



Grand Slam Titles:
Fed: 17
Sampras: 14
Nadal: 14
Borg: 11
Djoko: 9

Grand Slam Finals:
Fed: 26
Nadal: 20
Lendl: 19
Sampras: 18
Djoko: 17


Masters Titles
Nadal: 27
Djoko: 24
Fed: 23

Agassi: 17
Sampras: 11
Murray: 10
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yolita

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
62,010 Posts
Federer's % of matches won has not declined as he's getting older. The reason for this comparatively weak stat is that he lost a lot of matches as a young player. You'll notice his win percentage is 85 this season, above his long-term average. This is quite unusual, Agassi is the only other Open Era legend to post season win percentages over his own long-term average while in his 30s.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,169 Posts
Can't wait to see Nadal & Djokovic stats when they are 34
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,370 Posts
Federer stats actually grow (except GS stats) until 2013 (when he was 31.5) and again grow in 2014-2015. In 2014 he had 85.88% W/L rate, which is incredible. In 2015, he has 85.11%. Both bumped his overall stats (again, for all except GS stats). Better than 2003, when he had 82.1% W/L rate. He is definetly better player in 33 that he was in 21-22.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,892 Posts
Federer's % of matches won has not declined as he's getting older. The reason for this comparatively weak stat is that he lost a lot of matches as a young player. You'll notice his win percentage is 85 this season, above his long-term average. This is quite unusual, Agassi is the only other Open Era legend to post season win percentages over his own long-term average while in his 30s.
Not so bold prediction: Djokovic will have an Agassi-like post 30 career.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,370 Posts
If he dont lose speed he will. He is light (only 78kg) so it shouldn`t happen so soon (he has 7kg lesser than Federer or Nadal and 3cm more). IMO he will start do decline in 31.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,732 Posts
Federer's % of matches won has not declined as he's getting older. The reason for this comparatively weak stat is that he lost a lot of matches as a young player. You'll notice his win percentage is 85 this season, above his long-term average. This is quite unusual, Agassi is the only other Open Era legend to post season win percentages over his own long-term average while in his 30s.
Together with grkhetan's analysis, good for a new tennis fan to learn things tennis. :worship:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,415 Posts
Federer's % of matches won has not declined as he's getting older. The reason for this comparatively weak stat is that he lost a lot of matches as a young player. You'll notice his win percentage is 85 this season, above his long-term average. This is quite unusual, Agassi is the only other Open Era legend to post season win percentages over his own long-term average while in his 30s.
With the exception of 2013, of course (45-17, 72.58%).
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
62,010 Posts
With the exception of 2013, of course (45-17, 72.58%).
Yes, that season was well below average. 2011, 2012, 2014 and 2015 so far has been above average, and his career winning % is higher now than it was at the time of his 30th birthday. That is the unusual part.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,340 Posts
So McEnroe already putting him in the top 5 all time doesn't seem so silly now, doesn't it?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,370 Posts
In the end of 2010, Federer had 81.03 W/L rate.
At the mid of 2015, he has 81.57% W/L rate in a career.
From 2011-2015 Federer has exactly 83% W/L rate.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,049 Posts
Djokovic is in five best tennis player of all time. This stats prove that.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,429 Posts
So McEnroe already putting him in the top 5 all time doesn't seem so silly now, doesn't it?
It makes a lot of sense. All of Djokovic's stats point in that direction. He just needs to collect a few more slams to seal the deal. In terms of high-level consistency he even challenges Federer, which was not expected to happen 5 years ago, and he is likely to surpass Federer in several stats like slam semis and quarters.
 

·
Mostly unbiased analyst
Joined
·
3,982 Posts
It makes a lot of sense. All of Djokovic's stats point in that direction. He just needs to collect a few more slams to seal the deal. In terms of high-level consistency he even challenges Federer, which was not expected to happen 5 years ago, and he is likely to surpass Federer in several stats like slam semis and quarters.
Assorted Fed vs Djokovic stats:

Slam QF: 45 vs 33 (12): Unlikely
Slam SF: 37 vs 27 (10): Highly unlikely
Slam F: 26 vs 17 (9): Nearly impossible
Slam W: 17 vs 9 (8): Impossible
AOs: 4 vs 5: Already ahead
FOs: 1 vs 0: Tie possible
W: 7 vs 3: Impossible
USO: 5 vs 1: Impossible
WTFs: 6 vs 4: Possible
M1000: 24 vs 23: Already ahead
Titles: 86 vs 54: Highly unlikely
Weeks at #1: 302 vs 155 (147): Impossible
YE #1: 5 vs 3: Possible
 
1 - 20 of 59 Posts
Top