[TheBigFourFTW]

So what does it mean then? Does it prove that Djokovic is a better grass-court player than Nadal and Murray now?

 

[Why So Serious?]

Yes, that's what the numbers say don't they?

 

[RU90]

More importantly, Djokovic leads Federer 10-5 in finals.

 

[Why So Serious?]

More importantly, Djokovic leads Federer 10-5 in finals.

Holy shit :worship:

 

[_maxi]

Stop trolling man... Fed's almost 34 years old. Behave yourself. 2003-2007 Fed would have eaten this Djokovic.

 

[Why So Serious?]

Retire for your fans Roger, they're in ruins /s

 

[leng jai]

2009/2014/2015 was peak Federer, so yes.

 

[MIMIC]

More importantly, Djokovic leads Federer 10-5 in finals.

Good Lord.

 

[Floki]

And also 7-6 in slams ans 2-1 in slam finals.

 

[cveks]

great stats . Unbelievable

 

[Shepherd]

Stop trolling man... Fed's almost 34 years old. Behave yourself. 2003-2007 Fed would have eaten this Djokovic.

Maybe he would, maybe he wouldn't. The ironic part is that like so many other rabid Fedtards you didn't watch Federer in 2003-2007 but you guys keep referring to that mythical time you found out about on YouTube.