@Nole Rules Thanks for the correction on the numbers. Whether it's 37 or 38 winners from general play, the core of your observation is the same: Alcaraz was playing tennis on a different planet in that match.
As for your question, the short and perhaps unsatisfying answer is that it's almost impossible to say for certain. The "non-serve winner to total points played" ratio is a very specific, granular metric. Comprehensive historical databases that log winners, aces, and total points for every single tour-level match, especially from decades past, simply don't exist in a publicly accessible way. It's a bit like asking for a list of every Picasso painting that used a specific shade of blue, measured by the gram. The data just wasn't recorded with that kind of precision.
Could Federer have posted a similar ratio? It's highly plausible. In his dominant years, particularly in quick, best-of-three matches on fast surfaces, he was an absolute whirlwind of offensive tennis. Finding a specific match to prove it, however, would require a time machine and a very dedicated statistician to re-watch over 1,500 matches. While we can't give you a definitive record holder, we can say with confidence that Alcaraz’s performance puts him in an elite club of "in the zone" matches, where a player's aggression and accuracy are in perfect, and frankly terrifying, harmony.
