[MIMIC]

Used the bombshell tag for lulz

Anyway, what's the math for the ranking for these two? Was reading this article and apparently Carlos can be No. 1 by taking the IW title. How long would he be No. 1? And how long would Novak be No. 1 should Alcaraz not win IW? Any similar implications for Miami?

Carlos Alcaraz Beats Auger-Aliassime For First Time To Return To Indian Wells SFs | ATP Tour | Tennis

Carlos Alcaraz earnes his first win in four attempts against Felix Auger-Aliassime to reach the Indian Wells semi-finals for the second straight year.

www.atptour.com

 

[Tennis9000+]

Alcaraz would be the fake #1 again with the IW title but he would also need to defend Miami to hold it for more than 2 weeks.

 

[textenfan]

Novak will send Sinner a bottle of win if he does his job tomorrow.

 

[Slasher1985]

2 weeks, unless he can defend Miami title, in which case he adds 2 more weeks, until Monte Carlo comes around.

In reverse, if Alcaraz fails to win IW, Djokovic gets 4 extra guaranteed weeks.

 

[Rod_Laver Slam]

There is no way Alcaraz or anyone in his position would be a rightful number 1 when the real number 1 is forbidden to play at the main tournaments in the USA. This is absolute disgrace for sports and for the country of the "free'' as the hypocrisy has reached out of space levels.

 

[The Federest]

Not long anyway till the rightful #1 Alcaraz supplants the Serbian faker once and for all.

 

[Passion Alcaraz]

Absolutely deserved, Alcaraz would've either lost less or gained more points in AO if not injured, and would've been the favourite against Djokovic in the final.

 

[Last Man Standing]

Not long anyway till the rightful #1 Alcaraz supplants the Serbian faker once and for all.

Hey Federest, did your Mum drink when she was pregnant?

 

[The Federest]

Hey Federest, did your Mum drink when she was pregnant?

No, she was scared off it when she saw how your mum's kids turned out.

 

[Last Man Standing]

No, she was scared off it when she saw how your mum's kids turned out.

So how to explain you?

 

[The Federest]

So how to explain you?

Heroin.

 

[TooMuchRaquet]

Absolutely deserved, Alcaraz would've either lost less or gained more points in AO if not injured, and would've been the favourite against Djokovic in the final.

Definitely the crowd favourite but not the bookies favourite.

 

[Slasher1985]

Heroin.

Hero in, hero out, a bunch of hundred times, and voila. No?

 

[Tennis9000+]

Not long anyway till the rightful #1 Alcaraz supplants the Serbian faker once and for all.

A bit too late. He should have supplanted Djokovic before he breaks Fed's 310.

 

[The Federest]

A bit too late. He should have supplanted Djokovic before he breaks Fed's 310.

Yeah, Djokovic filled his boots in this weak era without any younger rivals.

 

[Last Man Standing]

Yeah, Djokovic filled his boots in this weak era without any younger rivals.

Extensive examination and comparison of eras shows unequivocally that Federer is the greatest beneficiary of a weak era.

He made his reputation in the absence of any real competition and once real competition arrived his success rate fell of a cliff.

History shows all this to be true.

 

[Slasher1985]

Extensive examination and comparison of eras shows unequivocally that Federer is the greatest beneficiary of a weak era.

He made his reputation in the absence of any real competition and once real competition arrived his success rate fell of a cliff.

History shows all this to be true.

How is extensive examination proving all that? By all accounts, no strong 20-25 aged competition existed in 2018-2023 either. 2018 is chosen as the mark when both Djokovic and Nadal have passed 30 years of age, equivalent to Fed's 2012.

By my extensive examination, either both these eras are weak, or both are strong.

 

[Last Man Standing]

How is extensive examination proving all that? By all accounts, no strong 20-25 aged competition existed in 2018-2023 either. 2018 is chosen as the mark when both Djokovic and Nadal have passed 30 years of age, equivalent to Fed's 2012.

By my extensive examination, either both these eras are weak, or both are strong.

Here you go:

 

[MIMIC]

Yeah, Djokovic filled his boots in this weak era without any younger rivals.

Does being bitter burn calories?

 

[Slasher1985]

Here you go:

Youtube videos by a Djoko pelican called Goatkovic are not exactly evidence.