:haha:
He's the best player I've seen since Stan Smith, now that's saying something.megadeth said:nope. i don't think he can go XX-0 for 2006. that's too much to ask. we all thought that way after his 2004 season by the way.
he'll still continue to dominate for sure, but he's still only human...
This is the stupidest post I've ever seen.its.like.that said:I think he can. He is really good.
Tell me why he can't? If Rodney can't beat him, then no one can.disturb3d said:This is the stupidest post I've ever seen.Which leads me to use my first ever emoticon.
First of all... it's physically impossible to attend each-and-every tournament of the year. But my post was aimed towards your ignorant speech, not the statement.its.like.that said:Tell me why he can't? If Rodney can't beat him, then no one can.
But Roger was injured at the Aussie Open, and he choked a matchpoint.megadeth said:how about this? aren't his 3 losses this year enough to make you realize that roger is beatable?
what are you? a 6-year old?
disturb3d said:First of all... it's physically impossible to attend each-and-every tournament of the year. But my post was aimed towards your ignorant speech, not the statement.
And seriously.... what makes you think he will go undefeated on clay? Where he's clearly second-best.
"If Rodney can't beat him, then no one can" ???????
Andy is a joke, I can name a dozen players who consitently give Roger more competition.
obviously, you're just here to try and pull my leg. the 68 events in the ATP don't happen one at a time. some are parallel with each other.its.like.that said:But Roger was injured at the Aussie Open, and he choked a matchpoint.
He choked against Gasquet, he should never have lost to him.
and Rafa got lucky.
you'll have to try harder to convince me why he can't all 68 events on the ATP calendar.
Of course he may receive bad luck, but here's to hoping he doesn'tmegadeth said:obviously, you're just here to try and pull my leg. the 68 events in the ATP don't happen one at a time. some are parallel with each other.
you mentioned bad luck, so what makes you think he won't receive his fair share of bad luck for next year?
i'm a roger fan, but you sir, are just plain idiotic...
playing 3-4 tourneys at the same time per week. yea right... :haha:its.like.that said:Of course he may receive bad luck, but here's to hoping he doesn't.
And of the 68 ATP events, I couldn't see a tournament director denying him entry to one of them. And we all know that Roger has a good to fairly good chance of winning each tourney he enters.
VAMOS ROGI
Get it through your head. It's impossible to enter every event.its.like.that said:And of the 68 ATP events, I couldn't see a tournament director denying him entry to one of them.