Wawrinka owns djokovic because he has a better backhand but you can still argue that one handed backhands are different from two handed backhands
now whats the excuse for RBA? someone who has just been routined by Sinner, a 19 year old
and why does he think rushing to the net would do him any good?he confused he is federer?
perhaps practising a bit of forehand and actually start attacking with that natural arm would save him from these embarassments in the future?
i read someone saying RBA owns Djokovic in BO3 format
NO, if he owns you in BO3 he owns you in BO5, BO7 BOwhatever
Sinner is the real NO1,Djokovic is only computer NO1,and his best shot isnt even ranked top2 among active players
now whats the excuse for RBA? someone who has just been routined by Sinner, a 19 year old
and why does he think rushing to the net would do him any good?he confused he is federer?
perhaps practising a bit of forehand and actually start attacking with that natural arm would save him from these embarassments in the future?
i read someone saying RBA owns Djokovic in BO3 format
NO, if he owns you in BO3 he owns you in BO5, BO7 BOwhatever
Sinner is the real NO1,Djokovic is only computer NO1,and his best shot isnt even ranked top2 among active players