Mens Tennis Forums banner

1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
388 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
It seems they're grumpy about not being able to buy the Australian Open. I think there should be more ATP/Challenger events in Asia, but they should be open to EVERYONE. Some of the demands being made (like reserving half of the places at Asian atp events for Asians) are just silly.


DOHA, Feb 21, 2008 (AFP) - Asia has broken away from its agreement with Tennis Australia to begin its own independent circuit, while criticising the failure of the sport's governing bodies to develop the sport in the region.

Without Asia going its own way it will be impossible for its young players to make the progress they should in the international game, according to Anil Khanna, the chief executive of the Asian Tennis Federation.

The ATF's solution, which involves Asia running its own tour for the benefit of Asians and doing its own television deals, has implications for the Australian Open, which has hitherto always been known as the Grand Slam of Asia/Pacific.

Young Asian players will no longer go to Melbourne as part of their reward for doing well, but have other rewards, including going instead to the season ending WTA Championships in Qatar in November.

"It's a concern how Asian players can make a living from matches to get an ATP ranking: tennis in Asia is not progressing so well," said Khanna.

"And while women's tennis is doing well we only have one male player in the top 100.

"To do something better for the players in Asia and for a huge number of children taking up tennis as a sport we are particularly keen to achieve our goal to give them financial benefits and motivation.

"We need an Asian ranking system, because tennis is an identity driven sport, and we are forming an organisation called the Asian tennis tour which will be under the chairmanship of Sheikh Mohammed."

The Asian tour, which will be for under-14 players only for the time being, began whilst retaining its links with Australia last year with a tournament in Thailand for eight Asian players and with prize money of 100,000 dollars.

It is not yet known where this year's larger, independent affair will travel to but it will have a circuit-ending Masters with prize money of 300,000 dollars plus hospitality for eight Asia-based players.

Qatar will host this immediately after the WTA (season-end) championships in Doha.

Ayman Azmy, the tournament director of the lucrative Qatar Open men's and women's tournaments in Doha, said: "We will have an Asian tour, and we are here to stay, and we have a point to make."

The Asian Tennis Federation is also planning more challenger events with 150,000 dollars prize money on the ATP Tour.

"The aim is for a longer calendar by 2009 which will create more possibilities for Asian players to earn money and create a more level playing field for them," said Khanna.

"We are in dialogue with the ATP, requesting from them a larger number of Asian players in Asian challenger tournaments. We are very hopeful that seeing the genuineness of our concern there will be a larger number of Asians in Asian challengers.

"It's not so easy for Asian players to travel so far. It's easier from other parts of the world to be travelling and get points, so it is necessary to have more challengers in this region. So I hope the ATP will help , though as yet it has not yet responded positively."

Khanna claimed there was an "anomaly in tennis". Whilst there are apparently profits of 800 million dollars from the four Grand Slams and ATP and WTA events the amount given to the development of world wide tennis "is not even worth mentioning".

All four Grand Slams spend money on their own development and individual promoters on both the men's and women's tours keep their own profits for themselves.

This fragmented market-dominated outcome is the inevitable result of the men's and women's tours having separated from the International Tennis Federation, more than three decades ago.

It means the ITF is unlike FIFA, which gives large sums to footballing nations or the ICC, which develops cricket.

"Unfortunately in tennis money available to development is very limited, and only left to the ITF to bring in a small amount - three million dollars for the entire world," claimed Khanna.

"So the profits from tennis tournaments should be given by owners of tennis tournaments to develop the sport. This is what we are wanting to correct. We need to create a fund for the development of tennis in Asia.

"And what better way than by creating another tour, and own TV deals, and overseeing our own development programme and under-14 tour. We are putting things right by becoming independent of Tennis Australia."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
388 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I agree. Anything that helps players make a living from playing tennis is great. However I'm concerned to read again the ATF's demands that 25% of places at Asian tournaments be reserved for Asians and that as many as 12 Challengers to be held in Asia be closed to players from outside the region. This would be tokenism at its worst.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,063 Posts
How about they spend their money on better training facilities with better coaching so players like Kei Nishikori don't have to leave the country to get top-notch training. Putting more asians in challengers won't do anything for their development when they lose first round. The problem is with the training not the competition.
 

·
F***ing have it
Joined
·
17,583 Posts
:retard:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
962 Posts
nice publicity stunt. How does being associated with the Australian Open make it impossible to develop Asian tennis :confused: all it means is that one of their weak male players won't get a wildcard into the tournament anymore.

They really need to get over this idea of the Australian Open moving to Asia. Tennis is not Formula 1. History and tradition actually means something. The Australian Open is a successful tournament anyway.

I really don't care anyway. The whole "Grand Slam of Asia Pacific" line was pretty lame.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
962 Posts
How about they spend their money on better training facilities with better coaching so players like Kei Nishikori don't have to leave the country to get top-notch training. Putting more asians in challengers won't do anything for their development when they lose first round. The problem is with the training not the competition.
I'm not sure if Japan is part of Asian Tennis Association. I could be wrong though.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,726 Posts
I personally think it's a horrible idea, and I say that as a strong supporter of most of the Asian tennis players.

Asian tennis needs good facilities and good training to develop young talent, so that in the future Asia has more top players. I am not sure creating a separate tour would really help in that regard. Sure, they might get more chances to play, but when it comes to competing with the best in the world, they will still be very far behind.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
388 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
I fail to see how this is going to have any impact on the ATP tour. It just means those who aren't good enough, even for futures, will get to make a tidy living in insular little tournaments of poor quality while being watched by a pitiful handful of spectators.

The assumption that simply by throwing money at the ATP, you can buy higher rankings for your players and then pass them off as genuine stars is pretty sad.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,856 Posts
I expect this tour to topple the ATP soon, who wants to see Federer play Nadal when they can watch the #860 and #1170 ranked asian players play each other?
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top