[ToanNguyen]

I read this article and here's part of it:

"You can talk all you want about Jimmy Connors amazing run to the U.S. Open semifinals in 1991 at the age of 39, but he never faced a player with the talent level of the zoning Blake, a guy who if he had managed to hold serve at 5-4 in the fifth set, could have gone on to win the tournament."


I don't think he could have won the tournament even if he won over Agassi. Can he beat Federer or Hewitt in the final? I don't think so. He played really well for his usual standard but I don't think it is still good enough to beat out Federer.

 

[ToanNguyen]

Everything is possible in tennis, look at Chang in 89. But with the ifs, we can go far... Blake is great and he will win a slam.

Of course everything is possible in tennis, however, realisticly speaking, the chance that Blake will beat Federer in final is quite low.

 

[ToanNguyen]

Oh so you admit he's not playing well.

I win. haha

Yea, I know. I love Andre don't get me wrong, I am just calling a spadea a spadea here and saying Blake shoulda won that match.

Agree. He choked big time. That is why if he's in the final, I think he will choke even more.