Let me get this straight. You include Mugray - who is a slamless clown and a joke on the big stage and you don't include Nadal who is a 10 slam champ and a former AO champion? To answer your question, Mugray is a darkhorse for the title - if he faces Almagro in the finalsAnybody outside Novak, Roger or Andy have a chance? Dolgo or Milos make any noise? Interested in your thoughts, thanks.
ahhahhahh this pretty much, strange to put Murray as a favorite but not Nadal. I get Murray has had fantastic form in recent times BUT he certainly has not ever shown the ability to bring it when it counts on the big stage, in moments of pressure and moments when has to fight from being down...Let me get this straight. You include Mugray - who is a slamless clown and a joke on the big stage and you don't include Nadal who is a 10 slam champ and a former AO champion? To answer your question, Mugray is a darkhorse for the title - if he faces Almagro in the finals![]()
:superlol: Mugray got taken to 3 by Kukushkin and Muller and beat green Tomic. That's good form? Wait till he runs into anyone good and he'll get sent packing from AO in tears.ahhahhahh this pretty much, strange to put Murray as a favorite but not Nadal. I get Murray has had fantastic form in recent times BUT he certainly has not ever shown the ability to bring it when it counts on the big stage, in moments of pressure and moments when has to fight from being down...
hahah it's funny you are so confident of that but let me remind you he has won the tournament before. you are being unrealistic saying he has 'no chance'. he has a great chance. even if he had not won a match in all of 2011 he would have a great chance because he is one of the best players in the world and the biggest fighter of them all....Rafa has no chance.
in general Murray is a better hard court player but not better than Nadal on hard court IN the best of 5 format, or SLAMS.Despite being slamless, Murray has more chances than Rafa because he's better on hard courts. Rafa is a better player, but Murray is arguably a better hard court player.
Murray still won't win though.
It seems that your tardism has somehow blocked your memory and you are unable to remember that Murray has beaten Mugdal at HC slams.in general Murray is a better hard court player but not better than Nadal on hard court IN the best of 5 format, or SLAMS.
it is no coincidence that Nadal has multiple Grand Slams on hard court and just recently at last year's US OPEN (hard court) beat Murray. Nadal is definitely the better hard court player when going the distance in best of 5. Murray is a better hard court player out of the main events in tennis, which unfortunately don't really matter nearly as much in the full spectrum of things.
Murray doesn't have more chances and you merely using the fact that Murray is great at best of 3 hardcourt tournaments means nothing. how can a player who is worse at hard court in a best of 5 format have a better, or more, chances than a player who is good at them?
the mistake you make is mixing things together as though tennis is always the same. just because Murray is more consistant on hard court does NOT mean he is a better hard court player than Nadal.
quality over quanitity.