Australian Open £100 Raise

Nice return of £185.60 today (+£85.60) would of been more but for Tommy's retirement. Thank god I bet with a bookie that voids retirements :lol:

Tomorrow's bets will be up in a bit

Redkop, he retired in the first set, not a single bookie or betting exchange paid out on that. Calm yourself. :lol:

ClutchOnandWin said:

Redkop, he retired in the first set, not a single bookie or betting exchange paid out on that. Calm yourself. :lol:

Click to expand...

Think you need to read what he said again...

^Yeah and Robredo retired in the first set. There are no bookies that pay out for a retirement IN the first set. Only after the first set has been complete. Every single bookie has voided the market for Robredo vs Roger Vaseline. One set must always be completed.

Mate, why are you becoming involved when you don't know what's being talked about?

The only time a retirement is NOT voided is WHEN the player retires AFTER the first set has been complete.

Robredo retired at 3-2 in the first set, so no one's parlay got fucked on this.

ClutchOnandWin said:

^Yeah and Robredo retired in the first set. There are no bookies that pay out for a retirement IN the first set. Only after the first set has been complete. Every single bookie has voided the market for Robredo vs Roger Vaseline. One set must always be completed.

Mate, why are you becoming involved when you don't know what's being talked about?

Click to expand...

I gather he was talking about he was glad he chose a bookie that payed out his multi rather than void the whole multi because robredo retired. He wasn't saying anything about what you are talking about regarding the first set retirement.

Please read it again...

You have got to read the words CLUTCH not what you want to see.

I'm happy to be proven wrong but I'm pretty sure redkop will confirm what I'm saying

No he didn't mean that and you will be apologising.

No bookies void the entire multi/parlay/accumulator based upon one retirement. They void the independent leg.

ClutchOnandWin said:

No he didn't mean that and you will be apologising.

Click to expand...

Haha whatever champ... i won't be apologising anyway. Your comprehension skills have been poor before so wouldnt be surprised

ClutchOnandWin said:

No bookies void the entire multi/parlay/accumulator based upon one retirement. They void the independent leg.

Click to expand...

He might not know that. Reading it it looks like that. Unless he was being sarcastic

JP92 said:

Haha whatever champ... i won't be apologising anyway. Your comprehension skills have been poor before so wouldnt be surprised

Click to expand...

You're so unintelligent. I'm being genuine.

JP92 said:

He might not know that. Reading it it looks like that. Unless he was being sarcastic

Click to expand...

lol, you act like he's your cousin or some shit. Why are we arguing over this anyway? I know I'm right.

He's not an idiot, he knows no bookies void parlays/multi's after one retirement and instead just void the single leg. It's YOU who didn't know this. :lol: You should talk less if you don't know so much in life, learn and then begin to speak up later, otherwise you embarrass yourself like this.

ClutchOnandWin said:

lol, you act like he's your cousin or some shit. Why are we arguing over this anyway? I know I'm right.

He's not an idiot, he knows no bookies void parlays/multi's after one retirement and instead just void the single leg. It's YOU who didn't know this. :lol: You should talk less if you don't know so much in life, learn and then begin to speak up later, otherwise you embarrass yourself like this.

Click to expand...

??? you come out with some weird shit. How do you know he knows that. He might just be a casual punter. Are you two cousins or bffs??? deadset....

ClutchOnandWin said:

Redkop, he retired in the first set, not a single bookie or betting exchange paid out on that. Calm yourself. :lol:

Click to expand...

ClutchOnandWin said:

^Yeah and Robredo retired in the first set. There are no bookies that pay out for a retirement IN the first set. Only after the first set has been complete. Every single bookie has voided the market for Robredo vs Roger Vaseline. One set must always be completed.

Click to expand...

ClutchOnandWin said:

The only time a retirement is NOT voided is WHEN the player retires AFTER the first set has been complete.

Robredo retired at 3-2 in the first set, so no one's parlay got fucked on this.

Click to expand...

Actually mate, bwin pay out on retirements after the first ball of the match has been played, a full set isn't required. I've been unwittingly stung by this in the past so I'm sure some people's bets would have got fucked on there after Robredo last night.

I do however think it was obvious that the OP was on about the bookies giving a loss to Robredo rather than voided his whole parlay.

Ladbrokes also used to use the 1 ball rule, I remember specifically using them for when I was certain Giles Simon would retire once. Apparently Coral and 888 used to use the 1-ball rule too but I'm sure they don't now.