[Stephan]

I found that h-2-h for these two is:
Nalbandian, David 1-3 Baghdatis, Marcos

Marcos lost only on clay, in the rest of surfaces he owned Nalby...

ATP, Davis Cup and Grand Slam Main Draw Results

2007 Wimbledon
Great Britain Grass R32 Baghdatis 6-2 7-5 6-0

2006 Australian Open
Australia Hard S Baghdatis 3-6 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-4

2005 Basel
Switzerland Carpet S Baghdatis 6-2 7-6(3)

2005 Roland Garros
France Clay R128 Nalbandian 0-6 6-4 6-4 6-4

few questions arised:

why,
because Marcos is 3 years younger?
because physicali stronger (M. by 2cm "longer" than D.)?
is Marcos a "problem" player 4 Nalby?
etc, etc ?

But my general question is:

what do you think (& why), who is more talented tennis player Dave or Marco ???

ps myself i like Marcos as player, but after Dave
Dave is able 2 beat more stronger guys...

 

[Stephan]

by the way, what is with Baghdatis?
i do not see him playing in any of current t-s...

 

[Klaas_nalbandian]

I think Nalby is the better and more talented player. If they meet now Nalby will win

 

[Stephan]

I think Nalby is the better and more talented player. If they meet now Nalby will win

OK :wavey:

but if they meet not now, and not on the clay?

 

[Rogiman]

Nalby is by far the better player, but Marcos will win again if they play each other this year

 

[Stephan]

... but Marcos will win again

i think, you're right, man
what, it means Marcos is a "problem" 4 Nalby?

 

[tripb19]

You asked why?

AO 06 we all know what happened, David lost that and not the other way around, moving on . .

Wimbledon 07 Baghdatis played out of his mind, hitting all the lines on the outside court, too good, too big.

Carpet Nalbandian would win now IMO.

Nalbandian is the better player but Baghdatis has the X-factor and when hot enough can destroy him. They are pretty evenly matched, hopefully hey play again this year, I like them both :yeah:

 

[Stephan]

You asked why?
Baghdatis has the X-factor...
I like them both :yeah:

me too (as players only ) :wavey:

 

[Klaas_nalbandian]

OK :wavey:

but if they meet not now, and not on the clay?

a top Nalby will beat a top Baggy on all surfaces

 

[Stephan]

a top Nalby will beat a top Baggy on all surfaces

:wavey:

Nalby has to prove it...

 

[Klaas_nalbandian]

:wavey:

Nalby has to prove it...

allways

 

[Dimonator133]

:sad: