Father time is undefeated, and Djokovic appears to have no advantage over Thiem at the AO, other than gamesmanship....
Djokovic had no other gear to go to, because nobody in their right mind would be happy with just ONE break in the 5th Set of a slam final.Is this a joke? To me Novak looked like he had another gear, even with the 5 set scoreline. Apart from that match, Novak was quite convincing throughout. If this slam was his most unconvincing, it only goes to show how he has overcome tougher situations in his other ones.
Australian Open 2019, Quarter-Finals = 1, 2, 8, 14, 16, 22, 28, unseededDull and his tards have no room to complain about after his disgraceful cakewalks and the weakest clay era of all time have allowed him to vulture multiple asterisked Slam titles.
You may have missed it but Thiem made Roland Garros Finals in 2018 and 2019, and beat Djokovic twice at Roland Garros.Is Thiem actually known for his clay stuff? Thiem averages no more than 2,63 games per set against eventual RG winner.
Now you will be thinking: 'that has to be wrong'.
It is not. It is actually even less: 2,625. The real RG contenders are dreaming of meeting Thiem.
Thiem has M1000 on HC.
I have not missed anything. Those calculations are made by me. Thiem averages 2,625 games per set against eventual RG winner.You may have missed it but Thiem made Roland Garros Finals in 2018 and 2019, and beat Djokovic twice at Roland Garros.
Made the Roland Garros SF in 2016 and 2017 too.