Nah! I think Djovokic will be higher than that 
He's very good
He's very good
2006 predictions for the young hopefuls...
Make you 2006 end of year ranking predictions for the following players
Andy Murray
Novak Djokovic
Gael Monfils
It will be interesting to come back to this thread and see who was on the money. Here are mine
Murray , ranking between 10-15
Djokovic, ranking between 70-80
Monfils, ranking between 40-50
Andy Murray
Novak Djokovic
Gael Monfils
It will be interesting to come back to this thread and see who was on the money. Here are mine
Murray , ranking between 10-15
Djokovic, ranking between 70-80
Monfils, ranking between 40-50
1 - 20 of 60 Posts
Monfils and Djokovic are already ranked where you put them for the end of next year. I seriously doubt that none of them will improve...evanzo said:It will be interesting to come back to this thread and see who was on the money. Here are mine
Murray , ranking between 10-15
Djokovic, ranking between 70-80
Monfils, ranking between 40-50
So out of the three, you think that only Murray will show any improvement whatsoever?
Well, naturally. To borrow a phrase from dreaded Eurosport commentator Simon Reed, he is a bonnie wee fighter.
Djokovic 23
Murray 24
Monfils 33
Murray 24
Monfils 33
Why does this here not make sense:
I definitely think Novak will be the highest out of the 3, say top 20 or higher maybe, I think Monfils will be around the same area, I say Murray will be around 30-40 area.evanzo said:...Murray , ranking between 10-15
Djokovic, ranking between 70-80...
I'm saying Djokovic will stay largely where he is, Monfils will make a solid improvement and Murray will continue to rocket up the rankings.
Monfils will make a solid improvement by not moving in the rankings at all?evanzo said:I'm saying Djokovic will stay largely where he is, Monfils will make a solid improvement and Murray will continue to rocket up the rankings.
Why provide a range for your predictions? Optimism is cheap, soevanzo said:Make you 2006 end of year ranking predictions for the following players
Andy Murray
Novak Djokovic
Gael Monfils
It will be interesting to come back to this thread and see who was on the money. Here are mine
Murray , ranking between 10-15
Djokovic, ranking between 70-80
Monfils, ranking between 40-50
Murray 1
Djokovic 82
Monfils 47
Hmm
In my logical order
1. Djokovic
2. Murray
3. Monfils
But I'm 100% with aj_m2009 Djokovic would be one of the best and very soon
I THINK!! Monfils has to work in his nerves
In my logical order
1. Djokovic
2. Murray
3. Monfils
But I'm 100% with aj_m2009
Djokovic would be one of the best and very soon I THINK!! Monfils has to work in his nerves
Djokovic is so devoid of talent I don't know why he is so popular on MTF, all the pundits are giving Murray the plaudits and the more they see him play the more optimistic their projections for his career. All I see in Djokovic is the potential for him to be a solid journeyman, his game is so unimaginative and forced that he is no different than the hundreds of other tennis factory kids. Murray is the only one that I can see that has the intangibles, the X-factor, call it what you will. The genetic offal of MTF clearly only appreciate greatness when it is in full bloom, and not whilst it is in growth. If you look at what some people here said about Federer before he broke through it is clear the average MFT denizen can't spot ability for shit.
I'm still waiting for enanzo to appreciate the magnititude of his/her Monfils error, but it looks like I will be waiting for a while.
each will win a slam next year
Chloe said:I'm still waiting for enanzo to appreciate the magnititude of his/her Monfils error, but it looks like I will be waiting for a while.
What error, his ranking for this year will level out with him being around 60ish, I expect him to end next year in the mind 40's a very significant percentile ranking improvement.
Not so sure how to respond.evanzo said:Djokovic is so devoid of talent I don't know why he is so popular on MTF, all the pundits are giving Murray the plaudits and the more they see him play the more optimistic their projections for his career. All I see in Djokovic is the potential for him to be a solid journeyman, his game is so unimaginative and forced that he is no different than the hundreds of other tennis factory kids. Murray is the only one that I can see that has the intangibles, the X-factor, call it what you will. The genetic offal of MTF clearly only appreciate greatness when it is in full bloom, and not whilst it is in growth. If you look at what some people here said about Federer before he broke through it is clear the average MFT denizen can't spot ability for shit.
These comments are based on absolutely nothing. I keep wanting to like Murray and then I read posts like these by his obsessive fans.
Back to the point of the thread... oh how I suck with long-term predictions. I have absolutely no clue where they will be ranked at the end of 2006 but I think Monfils will be the highest and will have the most solid year of the three.
2 for Novak.PaulieM said:each will win a slam next year
sure why notLeo said:2 for Novak.
:retard: When i read that i know i must go to bed...I don't see things clearly anymore...:lol:PaulieM said:each will win a slam next year
1 - 20 of 60 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Mens Tennis Forums
A forum community dedicated to male tennis players and enthusiasts. Talk about everything from the ATP, NSMTA, to college Tennis and even everything about equipment. It's all here!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Recommended Communities
