There is one clear choice of who would have won, but i´ll let you guys vote for my amusement
Yes i agree with you on that.Federer lost in the first round in 2002 of Wimbledon. In 2003 Federer only made it once passed the 4th round in a grandslam.
As an expert my money would be on Djokovic in 3 easy sets, perhaps the easiest slam final Djokovic would ever have.
How would you know, you where 7 years at the time :superlol:Noletards. :haha:
You know why he doesn't get as much praise and respect as Fedal?
It's because he isn't as good.
Nothing to do with his manner etc, no-one really cares about that stuff, it's because the guy is a lower tier, and most people are glory hunters, ergo he has less fans.
Also Federer in four, he was better in 2003 than 2004 you bloody mugs.
I'm practically just out of school and I know this stuff.
Do you tards even watch tennis?
Federer beats Novak nearly every time when he plays his proper game on fast surfaces, and that's not theoretical, it's what has actually happened.
The fact that he was off the boil (even for a 33yo) in the last two Wimby finals doesn't change that.
Delusions of grandeur, the lot of you.
And I don't even hate Novak, he's just trying to win as much as he can just like any player would.
He can't be blamed for his mob of brain-dead "fans".
Watching vidoes is sufficient.How would you know, you where 7 years at the time :superlol: