[greatkingrat]

I think we should have the whole set of rules in this thread - not just a supplement. It seems a bit silly to make people go to a different site just to find the complete rules.

[robuś]

Originally Posted by greatkingrat

I think we should have the whole set of rules in this thread - not just a supplement. It seems a bit silly to make people go to a different site just to find the complete rules.

done,
next time I will change all wta things for atp

[robuś]

Change of point 12

from

12. Am I permitted to play under two or more accounts in PAW?

In order to retain the integrity and spirit of PAW, this is not allowed. Players that appear to be suspicious of having accounts transmitting from the same IP, will have their IP’s checked from the MTF.com webmasters and could risk being suspended in PAW.
As for now we waive the following rule:
You must be a member on MTF for at least 2 months to play PAW and also have at least 100 posts.

to

12. Am I permitted to play under two or more accounts in PAW?

In order to retain the integrity and spirit of PAW, this is not allowed. Players that appear to be suspicious of having accounts transmitting from the same IP, will have their IP’s checked from the MTF.com webmasters and could risk being suspended in PAW.

You must be a member on MTF, with a full account's activation.

[robuś]

Change of point 17.5
from

17.5 Obligation of the WC player's.

A player who asks for a WC and receives it, is obliged to post his/her pick within 12 hours from the moment of posting the request for a WC. Otherwise the WC will be taken away.

to

17.5 Obligation of the WC player's.

A player who asks for a WC and receives it, is obliged to post his/her pick within 12 hours from the moment of posting the request for a WC, otherwise the manager can take the WC away if required (eg.: in the case when there is no WCs left and another player asks for it).

________

Added point 17.6

17.6 What if a player posts picks without commitment or WC?

His picks are not valid until he asks for WC. Therefore posted picks become valid at the moment of question for a WC. So picks for matches played in the meantime are invalid.

[robuś]

Originally Posted by robuś

next time I will change all wta things for atp

done, all stuff fixed

[DartMarcus]

How can I ask for a wildcard?

[robuś]

Originally Posted by DartMarcus

How can I ask for a wildcard?

just "ask" in the tournament's thread after deadline

[robin7]

Hi, I'm new here.

Okay. I just read post #78. That means I can play Wimbledon as long as my account is fully activated.

[misyou25]

hey, how can i see how many points do i have all in all? is that posted somewhere, like a ranking?

[robuś]

Originally Posted by misyou25

hey, how can i see how many points do i have all in all? is that posted somewhere, like a ranking?

Entry Ranking
Champions Race

[Ivanatis]

just wondering if there's some kind of gentlemen's agreement in case two players are close to each other before the final and have both one pick left ?

[robuś]

Originally Posted by Deck

just wondering if there's some kind of gentlemen's agreement in case two players are close to each other before the final and have both one pick left ?

If the two players are concerned about the gentlemen's agreement - by all means.
The two players can agree that the higher standing player won't "block" the lower one (by posting the same pick).
There were already many debates on that and unfortunately none conclusions, therefore in my tournaments everyone can post a pick e.g.

PAW13: Federer def. Nadal
if player X picks the same then please revers to Nadal def. Federer

[-Evita-]

I was thinking about the minimum 20 points that are used for the scoring points calculation. All the ATP players's points have been doubled so it makes sense that we increase the minimum amount, too. I'm not sure if we should double it because ATP players will have less points as the year goes by. My suggestion would be to change the 20 to 30 (or 35) and it should be done before the start of next week's tournaments. What do you think?

[sdtoot]

Originally Posted by -Evita-

I was thinking about the minimum 20 points that are used for the scoring points calculation. All the ATP players's points have been doubled so it makes sense that we increase the minimum amount, too. I'm not sure if we should double it because ATP players will have less points as the year goes by. My suggestion would be to change the 20 to 30 (or 35) and it should be done before the start of next week's tournaments. What do you think?

I agree, the minimum 20 points for calculation purposes should now be doubled to 40.

e.g. A player with 2000 'old' ranking points versus a player with the min 20 ranking points would give 100 PAW scoring points to the lower ranked player. A player with 4000 'new' ranking points versus a player with a min 40 ranking points would also give 100 PAW scoring points to the lower ranked player.

[robuś]

In case of unranked player or a player who has less than 40 ranking pts, he is allocated 40 pts for the calculation of PAW scoring points.

Thanks guys