Thread Tools

Melvins · 02-16-2006, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeccyB123

I used a formula to do my entry ranking and points system because i had to cut out a round.

Ok, but why don't you adjust the points (5 in Champions is 25 in Entry)? Or better: Why don't make only a system of points (5 in Champions is 5 in Entry)? If Challengers doesn't exist, why we need see big numbers when we can see the Entry Ranking with small numbers?

DeccyB123 · 02-17-2006, 08:25 AM

Because the ranking points is a 52 week rollover system while the race starts on 0 each year.

Melvins · 02-17-2006, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeccyB123

Because the ranking points is a 52 week rollover system while the race starts on 0 each year.

It's not my question!

My question is why we don't have the Entry Ranking and Champions with same system of points? I'm not talking about make only a ranking, but about the points in the Entry Ranking.

1st: We can cut the factor 5x, this system only make big numbers.

2nd: If we don't cut these factor, we need make the Entry Sytem Points with factor 5x.

So, in 2nd round the Champions has 5 points and Entry has 25 points, not 24 points. In actual system, we can have differents positions in the two rankings in the year-end.

Labamba · 02-17-2006, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melvins

It's not my question!

My question is why we don't have the Entry Ranking and Champions with same system of points? I'm not talking about make only a ranking, but about the points in the Entry Ranking.

1st: We can cut the factor 5x, this system only make big numbers.

2nd: If we don't cut these factor, we need make the Entry Sytem Points with factor 5x.

So, in 2nd round the Champions has 5 points and Entry has 25 points, not 24 points. In actual system, we can have differents positions in the two rankings in the year-end.

It's fun to have both Entry and Race ranking available (atleast I think so). But I agree with you, both rankings must have the same order of positions at the end of the year! Now when we can use the same system as the ATP, we shouldn't have these problems anymore.

Btw, Deccy why is it 24 points and not 25?

Haute · 02-21-2006, 02:23 PM

How long before the rankings are updated again?

Labamba · 02-24-2006, 07:05 PM

Ranking update would be needed for the seeding of players in the next weeks tournaments!

DeccyB123 · 02-24-2006, 08:19 PM

Its coming today, sorry but i just havent had time before now.

Melvins · 03-05-2006, 03:21 PM

DeccyB123, why you don't reply my question (about the differences in Entry and Champions)?

We continue use different points in Entry and Champions like in Indian Wells and Miami.

Gavnich77 · 03-12-2006, 01:14 PM

[quote=DeccyB123]ENTRY RANK POINTS:

Code:

 W......R/U....SF.....QF.....R16....R32 ....R48....R64....
IS400.......175....120....60.....24.....5...........................
IS600.......200....140....72.....30.....5...........................
IS600(64)...200....140....90.....40.....12.....5....................
IS800.......225....155....80.....33.....5...........................
IS800(64)...225....155....100....44.....12.....5....................
IS1000......250....175....88.....36.....5...........................
ISG800......250....175....88.....36.....5...........................
ISG800(64)..250....175....110....48.....15.....5....................
ISG1000.....300....210....108....45.....5...........................
ISG1000(64).300....210....135....60.....15.....5....................
TMS.........500....350....225....100....45.....5....................
TMS(96).....500....350....225....112....56.....21.....5.............
GS..........1000...700....450....225....112....45............5......

Deccy, I've ust noticed we don't have a points system for a 96 player TMS draw