 |
|
03-07-2013, 12:12 PM
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 27
Posts: 11,705
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPower
Yet some people are probably perfectly happy of just scraping by with a nice big family instead of putting that on the future, work their ass off trying to join the wealthy.
|
yes, i'm sure people with big families don't work their asses off and don't put nearly as much effort as the ones who "join the wealthy" 
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saberq
Nole will lose this I can see it.........disgusting mug,choker,loser I am ashamed to be half Serb
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
03-07-2013, 01:27 PM
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 26,915
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Har-Tru
In other words, if everybody earned the same amount of money, who would be the ones becoming architects, doctors, university professors? Could it be that we'd get a scenario where they'd end up being the same people as now?
|
Absolutely not. I love what I am studying, and I love the idea of eventually working as a doctor. But if I, as a future doctor, were to earn as much as a nurse, I would become a nurse. And this isn't the best example, because nurses have Higher Educations too.
Different incomes exist for a reason, but that doesn't mean the distribution and the differences are well applied.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21
some of you are missing the point. the video isn't proposing complete wealth equality. it's complaining about what they and I perceive as an extreme wealth inequality. extreme enough to the point one can regard it as unfair.
|
True. But what are your suggestions for change? This curve is now very difficult to change because it's a snowball, really.
|
|
|
03-07-2013, 01:46 PM
|
#33
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 27
Posts: 20,256
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by arm
Absolutely not. I love what I am studying, and I love the idea of eventually working as a doctor. But if I, as a future doctor, were to earn as much as a nurse, I would become a nurse. And this isn't the best example, because nurses have Higher Educations too.
Different incomes exist for a reason, but that doesn't mean the distribution and the differences are well applied.
True. But what are your suggestions for change? This curve is now very difficult to change because it's a snowball, really.
|
In Southern Europe they do. Not in Germany.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf
Armstrong says in-competition testing will never catch anyone, only out-of-competition testing and the blood passport can.
Tennis has no blood passport system, and does basically no out of competition testing.
The methods and drugs used by Armstrong in 1999 would work in tennis right now, with zero chance of being caught (not slightly surprising to anyone familiar with the topic, btw).
|
|
|
|
03-07-2013, 01:50 PM
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 26,915
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Har-Tru
In Southern Europe they do. Not in Germany.
|
Really? I had no idea!
|
|
|
03-07-2013, 02:59 PM
|
#35
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 27
Posts: 20,256
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by arm
Really? I had no idea!
|
Yes. Nurses do vocational training at a further education school, but not at university.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf
Armstrong says in-competition testing will never catch anyone, only out-of-competition testing and the blood passport can.
Tennis has no blood passport system, and does basically no out of competition testing.
The methods and drugs used by Armstrong in 1999 would work in tennis right now, with zero chance of being caught (not slightly surprising to anyone familiar with the topic, btw).
|
|
|
|
03-07-2013, 04:35 PM
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Proud Anglophile
Age: 29
Posts: 22,738
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Har-Tru
Yes. Nurses do vocational training at a further education school, but not at university.
|
In here they study for 4 years and u can study only in the university
__________________
Hug it out as long as it takes, people 
--------------------------------------------
"People were created to be loved
things were created to be used.
The reason why the world is in chaos is because things are being loved, and people are being used."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonja1989
I miss you, not Budapest 
|
sweet Di in action
Not a rafa fan just lost a bet with Marto
|
|
|
03-07-2013, 06:40 PM
|
#37
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 26
Posts: 5,561
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punky
In here they study for 4 years and u can study only in the university
|
In here it's a Bachelor's degree. The school are called "University of Applied Sciences" but they don't give Master's degrees. I think it might be 4 years though.
__________________
June 22nd 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lopez
Rosol might trouble Nadal if he has a good day of ballbashing.
|
June 29th 2012
Wimbledon R2: Rosol def. Nadal 6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 2-6 6-4
|
|
|
03-07-2013, 09:39 PM
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 28
Posts: 6,019
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21
yes, i'm sure people with big families don't work their asses off and don't put nearly as much effort as the ones who "join the wealthy" 
|
it's a net cost. You can work hard caring for family, doing volunteer work or whatever but it isn't gonna make you wealthy.
Talking effort purely to make money. Not effort in general. Big difference.
|
|
|
03-09-2013, 06:12 PM
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,554
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
If more knew the actual facts, I wonder what the impact would be on voting patterns and public pressure on politicians.
Most expect and consider a differential reasonable, but the extent of differential is extreme. The system is not working for the masses regardless of your political or economic views.
__________________
The current greatness league of active players in order of achievements to date (a factual comparison rather than fan biased assessment):
Federer 17 GS, 6 Year End Masters, 21 Master Series.
Nadal 11 GS, 0 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series, 1 Olympic Gold.
Djokovic 6 GS, 2 Year End Masters, 14 Master Series.
|
|
|
03-10-2013, 06:26 PM
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,414
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJules
If more knew the actual facts, I wonder what the impact would be on voting patterns and public pressure on politicians.
Most expect and consider a differential reasonable, but the extent of differential is extreme. The system is not working for the masses regardless of your political or economic views.
|
The facts are there for everyone to see, but sadly a large part of the voting population isn´t interested enough to find things out for themselves. They then become brainwashed by the empty promises every party makes just before the elections.
|
|
|
03-10-2013, 06:55 PM
|
#41
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Between Roger's ears...
Age: 23
Posts: 2,965
|
Re: Wealth distribution in the USA
Abraxas and his constant whine over America! 
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|