Thread Tools

delboy · 02-06-2013, 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy Emerson

Losing to Del Potro

on grass sealed the deal. Djokovic is subpar on grass and he still won Wimbledon so anything is possible. Murray winning RG would not surprise me at all.

pretty much. if djoko can win on grass muzzito can sure as hell win on clay

Saberq · 02-06-2013, 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by delboy

exactly. muzza has the talent to beat ferru on his own surface with ease. djoko won wimby ffs and he is the grass clown of the highest order.

wow I see British tards are in full force.....Djokovic is better on grass than Murray is on clay ...........LOL............Djokovic kicked Nadal's ass on grass in 2011....Muzza got owned..............and stop putting an all time great and a 6 time GS champion in the same sentence as a 1 slam wonder

tektonac · 02-06-2013, 02:41 AM

nadal made 7 unforced errors in that match and murray 39 on his fav surface

delboy · 02-06-2013, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saberq

wow I see British tards are in full force.....Djokovic is better on grass than Murray is on clay ...........LOL............Djokovic kicked Nadal's ass on grass in 2011....Muzza got owned..............and stop putting an all time great and a 6 time GS champion in the same sentence as a 1 slam wonder

ok listen I know Britain is the most successful nation on the planet and we ruled the entire world at one point but you dont have to be bitter.

Goldenoldie · 02-06-2013, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuzzahLovah

“I believe I have a chance of winning the French Open,” said Murray, the six-time grand slam finalist. “But to do that I need to prepare and use every single day as best as I can. That’s why, unfortunately, I decided not to play Davis Cup this time. I will play the match in September and I’ll be available for that.”

Are we sure there are not a few words missing here?
I think he said,“I believe I have a chance of winning a round at the French Open,” etc etc.
Signed: Realistic Murray fan

arm · 02-06-2013, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by delboy

ok listen I know Britain is the most successful nation on the planet and we ruled the entire world at one point but you dont have to be bitter.

So did we, my friend, and I am not bragging about it.

You two stop it. You are both being silly.

See what this thread creates?

Saberq · 02-06-2013, 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by delboy

ok listen I know Britain is the most successful nation on the planet and we ruled the entire world at one point but you dont have to be bitter.

bitter about Britain?me?LOl......USA here baby we rule the world NOW

delboy · 02-06-2013, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saberq

bitter about Britain?me?LOl......USA here baby we rule the world NOW

cos we let you..

BauerAlmeida · 02-06-2013, 02:48 AM

Djokovic on grass is under-rated. In 2007 he made the SF in Wimbledon just turning 20 and was beating Nadal before getting injured. In 2008 he was unlucky drawing Safin in R2. 2009 he lost to Haas but he was playing like crap at the time. Then he made SF, won it and SF again. He doesn't have a title because the grass season lasts 1 month and there's only one important tournament. Murray never won anything on clay but apart from RG there are 3 M1000 and countless 250 and 500 all across the year. Djokovic on grass is definitely superior to Murray on clay.

BauerAlmeida · 02-06-2013, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy Emerson

Exactly. Murray is the top 5 player that will last the longest. He is late bloomer and has less mileage than the other top 5 players.

Late bloomer?? In 2007 he was in the TOP 10 IIRC, same as Djokovic pretty much. He's been at the top for a while now. It took him a lot of time to finally win a slam, but that doesn't make him a late bloomer.