[delboy]

Originally Posted by GOATsol

even dull has a better chance

dull has zero chance.

[Roy Emerson]

It's going to be funny if by age 30 in 2017, the same age Lendl was when he won his last slam in 1990, late bloomer Murray already has achieved the Career Slam. Homogenization of the surfaces leading to four Career Slam winners from the same era.

[Saberq]

Originally Posted by delboy

ok he said it was his fav which he believes he plays best on...but whatever he would still be a huge fave against ferrer ffs even on clay.

no he wouldn't tard

[Saberq]

Originally Posted by Roy Emerson

It's going to be funny if by age 30 in 2017, the same age Lendl was when he won his last slam in 1990, late bloomer Murray already has achieved the Career Slam. Homogenization of the surfaces leading to four Career Slam winners from the same era.

I love this myth............they are not the SAME

[Roy Emerson]

I can already imagine Murray winning all four slams. Like Sharapova who once called herself a cow on ice when playing at Roland Garros. If Djokovic can win Wimbledon(his ONLY title on grass in singles) then Murray winning Roland Garros would not be that far fetched. Nadal won the USO so anything is possible.

[delboy]

Originally Posted by Saberq

no he wouldn't tard

lol of course he would don't be retarded.

[Saberq]

Originally Posted by delboy

lol of course he would don't be retarded.

yes I am retarded for saying Ferrer is better on clay than Murray right

[tektonac]

keep whimpering. nole won wimby fair and square.

[Saberq]

Originally Posted by Roy Emerson

I can already imagine Murray winning all four slams. Like Sharapova who once called herself a cow on ice when playing at Roland Garros. If Djokovic can win Wimbledon then Murray winning Roland Garros would not be that far fetched. Nadal won the USO so anything is possible.

newsflash Murray has 1 Slam total.....chances of him winning 3 more are remote but winning 3 that remain for him to complete that.......Nadal is better on hard 5x than Murray is on clay

[Roy Emerson]

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Murray's first title on clay was RG? Like Djokovic's first title on grass was Wimbledon.

Originally Posted by Saberq

newsflash Murray has 1 Slam total.....chances of him winning 3 more are remote but winning 3 that remain for him to complete that.......Nadal is better on hard 5x than Murray is on clay

Murray is a late bloomer. He will still be winning slams at 29-30.

[Saberq]

Originally Posted by Roy Emerson

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Murray's first title on clay was RG? Like Djokovic's first title on grass was Wimbledon.

it would......but Nadal wont let it happen

[Gabe32]

Obviously not true while Federer, Djokovic and Nadal are around.

But that is the mentality he needs, and maybe when they are all gone he can sneak one in.

[Roy Emerson]

Originally Posted by Gabe32

Obviously not true while Federer, Djokovic and Nadal are around.

But that is the mentality he needs, and maybe when they are all gone he can sneak one in.

Exactly. Murray is the top 5 player that will last the longest. He is late bloomer and has less mileage than the other top 5 players.

[delboy]

Originally Posted by Saberq

yes I am retarded for saying Ferrer is better on clay than Murray right

exactly. muzza has the talent to beat ferru on his own surface with ease. djoko won wimby ffs and he is the grass clown of the highest order.

[Roy Emerson]

Murray is more likely of winning RG than Ferrer. David is not slam winning material.

Originally Posted by delboy

exactly. muzza has the talent to beat ferru on his own surface with ease. djoko won wimby ffs and he is the grass clown of the highest order.

Prime Djokovic losing to Del Potro on grass sealed the deal. Djokovic is subpar on grass and he still won Wimbledon so anything is possible. Murray winning RG would not surprise me at all.