DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion? - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

Reply

Old 01-26-2013, 05:00 AM   #16
country flag BedsheetRubber92
Registered User
 
BedsheetRubber92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 74
BedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond reputeBedsheetRubber92 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Why are you so obsessed with trying to build constructs in order to classify players? There are so many unaccounted variables here that you can't possibly hope to make accurate predictions based on these retarded classifications. You seem to be basing your entire model off of the one example of the gap between Sampras and Federer. Their type of prolonged dominance is exceedingly rare throughout the course of tennis history. There's no reason to believe Murray is going to be squeezed out by a new GOAT anytime soon.
BedsheetRubber92 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-26-2013, 05:05 AM   #17
country flag MuzzahLovah
Registered User
 
MuzzahLovah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Age: 25
Posts: 16,385
MuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond reputeMuzzahLovah has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Yes, to the Tomic era.
__________________
http://www.menstennisforums.com/atta...8&d=1224521470

Emperor Nishikori- King of Comeback- Slayer of Demons- Champion of Tokyo- Conquistador of Barcelona
MuzzahLovah is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 05:16 AM   #18
country flag Mountaindewslave
Registered User
 
Mountaindewslave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8,201
Mountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by djokovicgonzalez View Post
I mean, this is definitely Djokovic's mini-era. Murray isn't so much a transitional champ as someone who got a Slam in when another man had control of the game.
If Djokovic maintains being the man to beat this season then it will definitely be his 'mini-era' of the past few seasons. but otherwise, no. for a player to be considered an era they really have to be the man to beat for seasons and seasons. few players would I even close to give this credit to, maybe Borg (late 70's into 80s), Roger (2004-2009), Sampras (1990s).
and Murray is and isn't. he did happen to win his slam when some of the better players on tour were declining but another great player is his same age (Djokovic and Nadal) so it makes this concept rather flawed. also Andy came close to winning slams (well uhhh sorta) for a few years now. also, unfortunately, he can't be a 'transitional champion' because the young generations blow and are never going to show up. the liklihood is that nothing is going to transition much when Nadal/Federer are gone, but more that Murray/Djokovic will just keep winning the biggest tournaments. or Tomic of course.

I hope to god some youngsters do really bring their game and a new era and that Murray ends up being a transitional tennis grand slam champion. because otherwise it will be a boring couple of years
__________________
<3 Roger Federer <3 David Ferrer <3 Juan Martin Del Potro <3 Ernest Gulbis <3

------------------------ <3 Richard Gasquet <3

Rafael Nadal
Mountaindewslave is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 05:36 AM   #19
country flag Naudio Spanlatine
I wanna taste u.
 
Naudio Spanlatine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lust and/or Love of fire. My heaven has awaited me.
Posts: 23,838
Naudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond reputeNaudio Spanlatine has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Im sorry i thought the title said "DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transexual slam champion?"

Im not trying to start anything but i swear i thought it said that.
__________________
#BENSPILLINTEA
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalusbrian View Post
Ben Rothenberg ‏@BenRothenberg 52m
Aside from everything else, Petra Kvitova is also the first player in WTA history to successfully recover from Radek Stepanek... #Wimbledon
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalusbrian View Post
Ben Rothenberg ‏@BenRothenberg 1h
Yes, Genie Bouchard is the next Maria Sharapova...in that she's being overwhelmed by Petra Kvitova in a #Wimbledon final. Up 6-3, 2-0.:
:
deestruction.tumblr.com
Naudio Spanlatine is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:16 AM   #20
country flag Poirot123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,133
Poirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Murray and Djokovic are going to dominate the next 12 slams if they stay fit and share them between one another, particularly the next 6 hard court slams. The only exception will be at the French Open and Wimbledon where Federer and Nadal (subject to return to full fitness) can still win. The likes of Tsonga, Berdych and Del Potro will remain dangerous, but will never win a slam in the next 3 years.
Poirot123 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:44 AM   #21
country flag Caesar1844
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,194
Caesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Djokovic and Murray are 26 in a couple of months. If you think they are going to maintain this level of play and dominate Slams until they are 29 then you are in for a fair bit of disappointment.
Caesar1844 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:47 AM   #22
country flag MinioNole
Registered User
 
MinioNole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,213
MinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond reputeMinioNole has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

^ And who would stop them? David Ferrer can still compete and win among these youngsters despite the age and to some extent Tommy Haas. It would really give you a picture about the situation right now. And that's not saying Nole and Murray have far superior fitness than the other two.
__________________
HE IS THE REBEL OF THIS MODERN DECADE OF TENNIS. HE IS THE REBEL WHO SPOILED THE ONCE DOMINATED FEDAL DUOPOLY. HIS NAME IS NOVAK DJOKOVIC!!!. AGAIN, HIS NAME IS NOVAK DJOKOVIC.
I TALKED TO JIM IN MY DREAM AND HE APPROVED IT EVEN IF HE HAS NO RELATION TO TENNIS.... BECAUSE HE'S WAY TOO COOL THAT'S WHY...

Last edited by MinioNole : 01-26-2013 at 10:54 AM.
MinioNole is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:48 AM   #23
country flag leng jai
Registered User
 
leng jai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxford (at heart)
Age: 26
Posts: 20,257
leng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caesar1844 View Post
Djokovic and Murray are 26 in a couple of months. If you think they are going to maintain this level of play and dominate Slams until they are 29 then you are in for a fair bit of disappointment.
They'll be there abouts for another few years. Who else is going to overtake them?
__________________
WARNING: This signature may contain extreme traces of bullying and glory hunting

TOMMY HASS
0 slams () and 0 finals
0 consecutive weeks at world no. 1
0 consecutive Laureus World Sports Awards
0 times qualified for YEC
3-13 H2H against Rogi Featherer
0-5 H2H against Rafito Nadal
Career low ranking: 1,241 (26.06.1995)
0 fake mullets flaunted in Roland Garros finals.
1 first name in common with Tommy Robredo
leng jai is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:50 AM   #24
country flag Hewitt =Legend
Registered User
 
Hewitt =Legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portugal (at heart)
Posts: 10,393
Hewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond reputeHewitt =Legend has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Benneteau.
__________________
Life is an orange and you're just a little pip.

Ol' Rusty Hewitt - Keeping me moist since 1998.

B-Nard4Lyfe.

BoGaNtiLIdiE.
Hewitt =Legend is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:59 AM   #25
country flag cocrcici
Registered User
 
cocrcici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: raw food world
Posts: 1,516
cocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond reputecocrcici has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MinioNole View Post
^ And who would stop them? David Ferrer can still compete and win among these youngsters despite the age and to some extent Tommy Haas. It would really give you a picture about the situation right now. And that's not saying Nole and Murray have far superior fitness than the other two.
__________________
Nole-falcon
*ajdenolesokole*
MURRALIEN
Thiem
Summer is coming...
cocrcici is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:02 AM   #26
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 29,222
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leng jai View Post
They'll be there abouts for another few years. Who else is going to overtake them?
We don't know who. But more often than not, someone comes along. After 2010 nobody would have guessed Nadal + Federer would only win one slam in 2011. Suddenly someone takes that next step.
Litotes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:04 AM   #27
country flag leng jai
Registered User
 
leng jai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxford (at heart)
Age: 26
Posts: 20,257
leng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond reputeleng jai has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litotes View Post
We don't know who. But more often than not, someone comes along. After 2010 nobody would have guessed Nadal + Federer would only win one slam in 2011. Suddenly someone takes that next step.
By then Murray and Djokovic were on the cusp and challenging consistently. Who are the equivalents now? It could happen but right now it's unlikely.
__________________
WARNING: This signature may contain extreme traces of bullying and glory hunting

TOMMY HASS
0 slams () and 0 finals
0 consecutive weeks at world no. 1
0 consecutive Laureus World Sports Awards
0 times qualified for YEC
3-13 H2H against Rogi Featherer
0-5 H2H against Rafito Nadal
Career low ranking: 1,241 (26.06.1995)
0 fake mullets flaunted in Roland Garros finals.
1 first name in common with Tommy Robredo
leng jai is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:07 AM   #28
country flag Poirot123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,133
Poirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond reputePoirot123 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litotes View Post
We don't know who. But more often than not, someone comes along. After 2010 nobody would have guessed Nadal + Federer would only win one slam in 2011. Suddenly someone takes that next step.
But there is absolutely no sign of it happening!Same old results with same old players. Tsonga and Wawrinka came closest to breaking the top 4 in this tournament, but no one else came close. And even if they did, they would've have had to back up that result with another win. Something the lower ranked guys have consistently failed to do.

There quite literally is no one on the horizon who will break through. Tomic still looks 2 years away. Dimitrov looks like a 'never will be', same with Harrison. Janovitz is probably 2 years away too. Raonic is a servebot with nothing else - he could improve in time?
Poirot123 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:09 AM   #29
country flag Caesar1844
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,194
Caesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond reputeCaesar1844 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leng jai View Post
They'll be there abouts for another few years. Who else is going to overtake them?
Who knows? There's a bunch of underperforming guys in their early to mid 20s who might eventually get their shit together. Dimitrov has been spudding it up for a long time, but the elements are there if he can get an attitude transplant and pull it all together. Cilic and Raonic have potential even though they seem to be mostly wasting it. Tomic may break through. Look at Federer - one day he was spudding along as a top 15 player and everyone said he was an overhyped pretty boy. Nek minnit, he's winning Wimbledon.

It doesn't necessarily have to involve them becoming as good as Djokovic and Murray are now either. I think people are forgetting how quickly defence-heavy players go from slam winners to highly beatable spuds as soon as they lose a step of speed. Look at Hewitt, Chang, Wilander. Murray and Djokovic have good weapons but if they can't get into the right position with time to hit them comfortably they suddenly become very ineffective. They're only an injury away from that happening. If they drop back a bit, suddenly they may find themselves losing to guys like Tsonga, Berdych and Del Potro who are less able but play games with likely greater longevity.

I think that unlike Nadal, Murray and Djokovic have the ability to adjust their games to their aging bodies - I actually think Djokovic could have great longevity if he moulds himself into an Agassi-style player based around his return and offensively dictating rallies from the middle of the court. But it remains to be seen if they in fact do that.

Djokovic and Murray may rule the game until they're 30. But I really don't think they will.
Caesar1844 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:13 AM   #30
country flag Zepploydath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Age: 19
Posts: 172
Zepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond reputeZepploydath has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: DILEMMA: Is Andy Murray a transitional slam champion?

I think people need to realise that the game itself is in transition. Long were the days where players started challenging at 18/18/19 and then dominating from 20-25. Players aren't peaking until 25/26 onwards. If Ferrer can play as well as he does at 30 then surely someone like Djokovic or Murray who is far more talented can win slams at least until 27/28. It's not necessarily a weak era, I just think the game has become far more physical which has come as a result of the slower courts/balls.
Zepploydath is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios