 |
|
01-24-2013, 06:15 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 508
|
If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Roger?
I am tired with the excuse for insulting Roger of Roger Federer anti.
no competition and weak era. Is it a fact?
OK, Roger does not exist as assumption. Then, other great players exist in that time. Could they continue winning like Roger Federer?
let me know.
And please also give me this explanation. Davydenko > Nadal. Roddick > Djokovic.
.
__________________
Nadal "Sampras, Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve" smug arrogant.
clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now.
fake time-out. cheat. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying always. excuse. boycotts threatened. always dissatisfaction cry complaints. dissatisfaction to schedule. selfish two-year ranking. bump to player. ugly protest. always exaggerated appeal of self condition. etc. overrated by fanatic arrogant blind fan 
Last edited by sportstennis : 01-24-2013 at 06:27 AM.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:17 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 22
Posts: 1,779
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Other than Nadal on clay, no.
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:21 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 148
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackhandDTL
Other than Nadal on clay, no.
|
this is correct |
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:23 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 508
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackhandDTL
Other than Nadal on clay, no.
|
I dislike Nadal. But, Borg and Nadal are greatest clay court player. fact.
thanks for the comment.
__________________
Nadal "Sampras, Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve" smug arrogant.
clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now.
fake time-out. cheat. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying always. excuse. boycotts threatened. always dissatisfaction cry complaints. dissatisfaction to schedule. selfish two-year ranking. bump to player. ugly protest. always exaggerated appeal of self condition. etc. overrated by fanatic arrogant blind fan
Last edited by sportstennis : 01-24-2013 at 06:32 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: everywhere...
Age: 23
Posts: 5,200
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Prime No2e would get atleast 10 slams in 2004-2007 period.
__________________
Quote:
|
To the well-organized mind, death is but the next great adventure.
|
BigJohn  
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:25 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 508
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Davydenko > Nadal.
Roddick > Djokovic.
My explanation. It is from Roddick's decline that Djokovic began to win Roddick.
Djokovic or Nadal are blessed with the too much slow surface age. If they exist in the quick time of grass or hard court, there are few chances for them to win the victory.
What do you think?
__________________
Nadal "Sampras, Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve" smug arrogant.
clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now.
fake time-out. cheat. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying always. excuse. boycotts threatened. always dissatisfaction cry complaints. dissatisfaction to schedule. selfish two-year ranking. bump to player. ugly protest. always exaggerated appeal of self condition. etc. overrated by fanatic arrogant blind fan
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:28 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: everywhere...
Age: 23
Posts: 5,200
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportstennis
Davydenko > Nadal.
Roddick > Djokovic.
My explanation. It is from Roddick's decline that Djokovic began to win Roddick.
Djokovic or Nadal are blessed with the too much slow surface age. If they exist in the quick time of grass or hard court, there are few chances for them to win the victory.
What do you think?
|
__________________
Quote:
|
To the well-organized mind, death is but the next great adventure.
|
BigJohn
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:30 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 22
Posts: 1,779
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliSter
Prime No2e would get atleast 10 slams in 2004-2007 period.
|
Nole would not be a serious contender for Wimbledon between '04-'05. So even if he were to dominate hard courts at the time, which is a possibility (though Safin or Agassi at OZ would suggest otherwise), he could not end up with 10 without a couple of RGs, and that is a big ask. |
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:35 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: everywhere...
Age: 23
Posts: 5,200
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackhandDTL
Nole would not be a serious contender for Wimbledon between '04-'05. So even if he were to dominate hard courts at the time, which is a possibility (though Safin or Agassi at OZ would suggest otherwise), he could not end up with 10.
 |
Nole is better version of Agassi and i see no reason he would lose from him. Safin won it once and that was it. He vanquished after that. No2e would have no match in HC during 2004-2007.
__________________
Quote:
|
To the well-organized mind, death is but the next great adventure.
|
BigJohn
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:35 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Netherlands
Age: 21
Posts: 11,830
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
If they were in that generation, the only one that couldn't 'continue winning' was Roger, because he never would've started winning. And Andy of course, but he's irrelevant
__________________
RAFAEL NADAL
Greatest Of All Time
Real #1
1 AO - 8 RG - 2 W - 1 USO
UN8ELIEVABLE
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:39 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 508
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliSter
|
Where is your explanation?
I'm sure. Heyday Roddick almost wins heyday Djokovic by hard court.
Because, the Roger Federer generation's time was surface still faster than now. especially US open, etc.
NO?
__________________
Nadal "Sampras, Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve" smug arrogant.
clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now.
fake time-out. cheat. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying always. excuse. boycotts threatened. always dissatisfaction cry complaints. dissatisfaction to schedule. selfish two-year ranking. bump to player. ugly protest. always exaggerated appeal of self condition. etc. overrated by fanatic arrogant blind fan
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:52 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 508
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSMnadal
If they were in that generation, the only one that couldn't 'continue winning' was Roger, because he never would've started winning. And Andy of course, but he's irrelevant
|
Why did I make this thread? because fans, such as Nadal or Djokovic, always says. The Roger Federer era did not have competition and weak. Since there was competition now, it became impossible for Roger Federer to win. Although present Roger is already old and decline.
However, even turned 30 years old, old weak Roger Federer is continuing taking a title. I do not understand truly.
__________________
Nadal "Sampras, Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve" smug arrogant.
clay excluded. successive win 0. If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now.
fake time-out. cheat. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying always. excuse. boycotts threatened. always dissatisfaction cry complaints. dissatisfaction to schedule. selfish two-year ranking. bump to player. ugly protest. always exaggerated appeal of self condition. etc. overrated by fanatic arrogant blind fan
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:58 AM
|
#13
|
|
Banned!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 17
Posts: 2,735
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportstennis
Why did I make this thread? because fans, such as Nadal or Djokovic, always says. The Roger Federer era did not have competition and weak. Since there was competition now, it became impossible for Roger Federer to win. Although present Roger is already old and decline.
However, even turned 30 years old, old weak Roger Federer is continuing taking a title. I do not understand truly.
|
According to them Roger of nowadays is better than 2005 Roger |
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 09:57 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,911
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliSter
Prime No2e would get atleast 10 slams in 2004-2007 period.
|
no.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor
People need to wake up. Olderer is not winning anymore slams - neither is he going to become #1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 10:12 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: super mario world
Posts: 6,234
|
Re: If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Ro
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliSter
Prime No2e would get atleast 10 slams in 2004-2007 period.
|
yeah because it's better to deal with prime fed,safin and fit nadal?
same players now just older plus the youngsters now show no promise..plus some legends have retired.
now even nadal is semi retired. yeah stronger era 
what i would like fed to be nole and murray's age now so he could win everything.
__________________
SuperSport Superslam  "good for the sport"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
If Fed's generation has Djoko or Nadal or Andy, Did they continue winning like Roger?
