 |
|
09-28-2012, 08:52 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 15,803
|
Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Fiasco had so many chances. Up a break in the 1st. Had like a zillion BP's in that 2nd set at 4-3* to break serve. Every time Tipsy had a BP, he converted (once to break back in the 1st set, and at 4-4* in 2nd set)...   
Terrible match from both. Shitsarevic has no chance whatsoever against Pushmon if he keeps up his awful form.
__________________
Quote:
Hian about himself
Quote:
No words can describe me.
Without me, it would be just aweso.
|
|
No shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi
Never held a racquet in my life.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi
I've played the game for close to 10 years. This should come as no surprise to many.
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 08:57 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 22
Posts: 2,231
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Will Topdasco ever have a match without numerous chokes?
__________________
 Gasquet is next №1
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 08:58 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 20
Posts: 4,942
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Better and more talented player won. Mugdasco is a complete mug.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 09:51 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 789
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Clash of mental titans
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 09:56 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 24
Posts: 2,110
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
absolutely horrendous advertisement for the game 
truly disgusting display of tennis; these two need to retire for the good of the game
classification of tennis as a professional sport seriously endangered |
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 10:07 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Age: 22
Posts: 7,829
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Verdaschoke
I predicted 7-6(4) 6-2, close enough
__________________
Current: Top 5 Youngsters
1. David Ferrer
2. Ernests Gulbis
3. Grigor Dimitrov
4. Miloserve Botnic
5. Muggowiz
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 10:27 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,464
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Terrible result for the game, Tipsarevic is a talentless mug and a complete clown, he doesnt deserve to be in the top 10. Raonic is more deserved than he is.
Its a shame to think how much Verdasco's career declined, its quite sad. He used to be a good player with mental issues, but now he is a terrible player and his mentality is even worse. Look at the state of tennis: Everyone on MTF knows Verdasco is a terrible mug, and this guy was in the top 10 and now in the top 20 for ages, seems like years and years already. Think about it.
__________________
FEDERER
KARLOVIC
RAONIC
AND ALL OTHER SERVEBOTS
SERVEBOTS ARE TENNIS
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 11:00 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mount Sharp
Age: 34
Posts: 8,169
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satasonic
Terrible result for the game, Tipsarevic is a talentless mug and a complete clown, he doesnt deserve to be in the top 10.
|
__________________
“There’s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,” he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, “they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don’t succeed in the end. I’m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.”
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 11:13 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 28
Posts: 16,768
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satasonic
Terrible result for the game, Tipsarevic is a talentless mug and a complete clown, he doesnt deserve to be in the top 10. Raonic is more deserved than he is.
Its a shame to think how much Verdasco's career declined, its quite sad. He used to be a good player with mental issues, but now he is a terrible player and his mentality is even worse. Look at the state of tennis: Everyone on MTF knows Verdasco is a terrible mug, and this guy was in the top 10 and now in the top 20 for ages, seems like years and years already. Think about it.
|
Fiasco at one time had third best forehand in the game behind Nadal and Noserer as well as decent serve and good movement and fitness, his stay in top 10 was well deserved unlike plenty of mugs I could name. Right now though this playboy doesn't seem to care about the game anymore and can't beat useless clowns like Crapsarevic. Hilarious thing is his mental strength is even worse than before, which is a feat in itself. Bottom line is Fiasco could have been a solid top tenner and a regular in slam second week if his head was screwed on properly.
__________________
20-10
Honestly banned  Thanks mods, for taking out the trash 
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 11:30 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 20
Posts: 4,942
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satasonic
Terrible result for the game, Tipsarevic is a talentless mug and a complete clown, he doesnt deserve to be in the top 10. Raonic is more deserved than he is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 12:30 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,464
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Haha, do you seriously believe that Tipsarevic should be a top 8 seed in the slams? There are at least 2 better players than him which are not in the top 8, he got his points through vulturing. Look at him- 2 titles (!) and a top 8 seeding, disgraceful. Stakhovsky has got more career accomplishments than Tipsarevic...
Its funny that only the Serbtards think that Tipsarevic is a good player, while most of the forum completely agrees with me. If Federer is by far my favorite player, it doesnt mean that Wawrinka is a good player who I should like, too. It defies common sense- not every Nadal fan must like Ferrer and vise versa, seriously.
__________________
FEDERER
KARLOVIC
RAONIC
AND ALL OTHER SERVEBOTS
SERVEBOTS ARE TENNIS
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 12:49 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mount Sharp
Age: 34
Posts: 8,169
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satasonic
Its funny that only the Serbtards think that Tipsarevic is a good player, while most of the forum completely agrees with me. If Federer is by far my favorite player, it doesnt mean that Wawrinka is a good player who I should like, too. It defies common sense- not every Nadal fan must like Ferrer and vise versa, seriously.
|
Liking or not liking someone is one thing, whether he's actually good another. Your logic is the usual bs, I don't like a player = The player is bad
__________________
“There’s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,” he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, “they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don’t succeed in the end. I’m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.”
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 12:52 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 9,522
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satasonic
Haha, do you seriously believe that Tipsarevic should be a top 8 seed in the slams? There are at least 2 better players than him which are not in the top 8, he got his points through vulturing. Look at him- 2 titles (!) and a top 8 seeding, disgraceful. Stakhovsky has got more career accomplishments than Tipsarevic...
Its funny that only the Serbtards think that Tipsarevic is a good player, while most of the forum completely agrees with me. If Federer is by far my favorite player, it doesnt mean that Wawrinka is a good player who I should like, too. It defies common sense- not every Nadal fan must like Ferrer and vise versa, seriously. |
I'm not a Serbtard by any stretch of imagination and I do think Tipsarevic is a good player, because, well, he is. A great player actually, one of the best shotmakers on tour. There are some current top 10 players who are way out of place, Tipsarevic isn't one of them at all, if anything he should have joined the elite much sooner given his talent. |
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 01:14 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,464
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. However- let me ask you this: How is Tipsarevic (and to a lesser point, mugaco) be good for the game, when the TOP 8 seeds are literally walkovers? Imagine- if in the next year Nadal and Del Potro will be out of the Australian Open- The top 8 seeds would be 6 good players, with Tipsarevic and Monaco. The serbtards like Tipsarevic not only because he is Serbian, but also because he is literally a walkover for the top players. Djokovic gets Tipsarevic in his quarter, while Federer gets Berdych.
How can someone like Tipsarevic be good for the top 8, if he cant even beat Raonic in Chennai, or Isner who is an atrocious mug himself?
Also, another idea: Tipsarevic was the 8 seed in the 2012 USOpen. Lets look at previous 8 seeds at previous US Opens, and determine who is the better player out of these guys:
2008- Roddick
2009- Davydenko
2010- Verdasco
2011- Fish
The only player who Tipsarevic can have an argument against is Fish. And even Fish is a better 8th seed, because he has several Masters finals, when Tipsarevic has 2 MM titles.
Hope that gives you something to think about 
__________________
FEDERER
KARLOVIC
RAONIC
AND ALL OTHER SERVEBOTS
SERVEBOTS ARE TENNIS
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 01:20 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mount Sharp
Age: 34
Posts: 8,169
|
Re: Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satasonic
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. However- let me ask you this: How is Tipsarevic (and to a lesser point, mugaco) be good for the game, when the TOP 8 seeds are literally walkovers? Imagine- if in the next year Nadal and Del Potro will be out of the Australian Open- The top 8 seeds would be 6 good players, with Tipsarevic and Monaco. The serbtards like Tipsarevic not only because he is Serbian, but also because he is literally a walkover for the top players. Djokovic gets Tipsarevic in his quarter, while Federer gets Berdych.
|
Ah, finally we get to the bottom of this rant: Federer gets Berdych, wah wah wah FYI, Djokovic-Tipsarevic in the last 2 yrs is 3-2. So not only you're a common tard and hater, you can't even check the basic facts.
__________________
“There’s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,” he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, “they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don’t succeed in the end. I’m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Bangkok QF: [1]Tipsarevic def. [5]Verdasco 7-6(5), 6-4
